Answer:
Digital Fruit
The expected market price of the common stock after the announcement is:
$20 per share.
Explanation:
Outstanding number of shares = 40 million
Market price of outstanding shares = $20 a share
Total market capitalization = $800 million
Debts introduced = $310 million
Market capitalization after the debt issue = $490 million ($800 - 310 million)
Number of shares bought back = $310 million /$20 = 15,500,000
Outstanding number of shares after the buy-back = 40 million minus 15.5 million
= 24,500,000 shares
Expected market price of the common stock after the announcement
= $490,000,000/24,500,000
= $20 per share
Answer:
yes
Explanation:
any all all my stuff going see week
Answer:
the three of them could be held personally liable:
- I. John
- II. John's manager
- III. The CEO, who in this specific case we assume could have prevented the crime.
Explanation:
John committed forgery and possibly fraud by forging clients' signatures on documents held by the company. His boss ordered him to do so, so he is also responsible for John's actions. John can even try to put all the blame on his boss alleging that he was forced to forge the signatures. The CEO of the firm is also responsible because the forged documents had to serve someone's illegal purposes, and the CEO probably was the one that needed them or knew about what was going on and didn't do anything to stop it.
<h2>meet with Chad in person and establish goals for improvement.</h2>
Explanation:
- Whenever an employee shows negativity either to his co-employee or to sub-ordinates, it is better to call in person and meet.
- We can get the pointers which is making that particular employee to behave in such a manner or we can otherwise guide that employee in the right direction so that the organizational goals are met.
Following things will not work:
- Discussing about the poor performance of Chad's with other managers
- Sending an e-mail stating the poor performance of Chad's to all the employees.
- Warning Chad's coworker is not a good solution, because here Chad's behavior towards co-workers are wrong and not vice versa.
Answer:
False
Explanation:
Natalie can return the washing machine without being liable for any replacement costs. Natalie is a minor, and minors cannot legally sign a contract except for purchasing necessities, e.g. food, clothes.
Since the washing machine probably had a significant cost, there should have been a written contract between the parties. The rental company should have requested Natalie some type of legal identification before renting the washing machine and signing the contract. Their only possible defense is that Natalie used a forged ID when she rented the machine, and that they were ticked by it.
But if the rental company cannot prove that Natalie tricked them using some fake ID, then Natalie has the right to void the contract and return the item. It doesn't matter if the washing machine suffered damages or not, Natalie is not liable for any reparation or replacement costs.
