Loans are sums of money that are expected to be paid back with interest or in full
The lack of feasibility in doing repairs on the property inherited by Jim is called: incurable.
Incurable can be defined as any set of defects that is practically impossible for a property owner to fix, repair or cure, especially due to lack of maintenance and finance.
This ultimately implies that, incurable is a term that is associated with depreciation and it arises when the cost of repair of a property is far greater than the financial value of the property.
In conclusion, the lack of feasibility in doing repairs on the property inherited by Jim is called incurable.
Read more on incurable here: brainly.com/question/7986346
The demand curve for a monopolistically competitive firm is downward sloping because there is a full or advanced degree of the powerfulness in the market.
<h3>What is the shape of demand curve of the monopolistically competitive firm?</h3>
A downward sloping demand curve characterizes a monopolistically competitive corporation because there is a lot of power in the market.
This curve signaled that the business firm has extraordinary market power. As each firm offers a unique product, market dominance is derived from product differentiation.
Therefore, the demand curve of monopolistically competitive market is downward sloping.
To learn more about the demand curve, refer to:
brainly.com/question/13131242
#SPJ4
Complete question:
Consider the game of chicken. Two players drive their cars down the center of the road directly at each other. Each player chooses SWERVE or STAY. Staying wins you the admiration of your peers (a big payoff) only if the other player swerves. Swerving loses face if the other player stays. However, clearly, the worst output is for both players to stay! Specifically, consider the following payouts. Player two Stay swervePlayer one stay -6 -6 2 -2 swerve -2 2 1 1
a) Does either player have a dominant strategy?
b) Suppose that Player B has adopted the strategy of Staying 1/5 of the time and swerving 4/5 of the time. Show that Player A is indifferent between swerving
and staying.
c) If both player A and Player B use this probability mix, what is the chance that they crash?
Explanation:
a. There is no dominant strategy for either player. Suppose two players agree to live. Then the best answer for the player is to swerve(-6 versus -2). Yet if the player turns two, the player will remain one (2 vs 1).
b. Player B must be shown to be indifferent among swerving and staying if it implements a policy (stay= 1⁄4, swerving= 5/4).
When we quantify a predicted award on the stay / swerving of Player A, we get
E(stay)= (1/5)(-6)+ (4/5)(2)= 2/5 E(swerve)= (1/5)(-2)
c. They both remain 1/5 of the time. The risk of a crash (rest, stay) is therefore (1/5)(1/5)= 1/25= 4%
Answer:
8gc uv u o du I. 8. o ixd u. o
