1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
gayaneshka [121]
3 years ago
15

1. Why did people migrate to the Western Frontier lands?

History
1 answer:
MrRa [10]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

to avoid persecution or to claim land and gold.

Explanation:

Westward expansion ;<;

You might be interested in
"All, too, will bear in mind this sacred principle, that though the will of the majority is in all cases to prevail, that will t
zaharov [31]

Answer:

Jefferson is trying to say that humans are humans and all humans should be treated with rights as others are also. We may come from different backgrounds, religions, ect. in a way that makes us all different but does not mean we need to face persecution for our beliefs. He encourages people to come together in unity instead of hatred.

7 0
3 years ago
What cataclysmic event seems to have forced therans to abandon their civilization sometime between 1700 and 1500
yarga [219]
Plzddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddd
6 0
3 years ago
Why did the Reformation begin in Germany?
krek1111 [17]
<span>The Reformation began in Germany in 1517 because an Augustinian monk named Martin Luther, who lived in Germany, wrote "95 Theses" protesting the Pope's selling indulgences. ... Because Luther was very outspoken about his feelings, the Reformation started in Germany and spread.</span>
6 0
2 years ago
“Now, suppose that all the English and the whole English army were to leave India, taking with them all their cannon and their s
svetoff [14.1K]

Answer:

Check Explanation

Explanation:

In Question one. The passage illustrates a response to European colonialism when Syed Ahmad Khan mention that the European occupation of India has brought peace between the Muslims and the Hindus. In his speech to the Muslim community in Meeerut, he said “Now, suppose that all the English and the whole English army were to leave India, taking with them all their cannon and their splendid weapons and everything, then who would be rulers of India? Is it possible that under these circumstances two nations—the Muslims and the Hindus—could sit on the same throne and remain equal in power? Most certainly not". In the passage, he illustrates that the Muslims and the Hindus will not tolerate each other in the aspect of Government and that the English occupation has brought peace between the two religion

ONE way in which the circumstances of the speech might have affected the author's argument in the passage are the words he said about the ropes of Government. He said that "For the successful running of a democratic government, it is essential that the majority should have the ability to govern not only themselves but also unwilling minorities". This words affected his argument. He was speaking on the possibility that if the Europeans were to leave India, it Hindus and the Muslims can't formed a peaceful goverment together, while again saying that a democratic goverment has the Ability to control not only the majority but also the minority. In is speech, he stated that both were of different Nationality and therefore both can not formed a goverment together but he fail to realize that he was also against his point when he laid down the attributes of a Democratic goverment

In his Author' views, the European ideologies influenced the development of Indian society in the nineteenth century through the new ideologies made by the aims and objectives of the Indian National Congress which they presuppose that the various religions, castes, and ethnic groups of India can all be treated alike and all of them belong to the same nation. It can also be seen in the general acceptable goverment of democracy which which was being enforce in India by European.

6 0
3 years ago
The Supreme Court case that established the principle that the Court could declare acts of Congress unconstitutional was:
andreev551 [17]
The Supreme Court case that established the principle that Court could declare acts of Congress unconstitutional was Marbury versus Madison case. This was the first case in united states history in which the supreme Court struck down on an act of Congress and declared it unconstitutional. This case happened in the year 1803. The unanimous court decision was written down by the Chief justice John Marshall.
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • which of the following is an example of a medieval guild? a. monks who made agreements to provide an education to townspeople in
    8·2 answers
  • Compare the environmental and demographic effects of the Columbian Exchange on the Americas with one of the following regions be
    11·1 answer
  • What were Native Americans that constantly moved around in search of food?
    15·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements is NOT true of modern terrorism?
    6·1 answer
  • The South's assets as the Civil War broke out included all of the following EXCEPT?
    13·1 answer
  • As america moved farther west it opened up possible trade with?
    5·1 answer
  • How many amendments are in the Constitution?<br><br> 24<br> 27<br> 21<br> 25
    10·2 answers
  • Explain the causes of the American Revolution by explaining how each document below represents a grievance (complaint) the colon
    9·1 answer
  • HELPPPPPPP
    6·1 answer
  • Gawain sa Pagkatuto Bilang 2: Sagutin ang mga sumusunod na tanong.
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!