A Thurstone scale was constructed to measure creativity. The scale scores ranged from 1 to 13. If the scale was properly constru
cted we could conclude that: a. A person with a score of 6 was three times as creative as a person with a score of 2. b. A person with a score of 6 was more creative than a person with a score of 5. c. A person with a score of 5 was half as creative as someone with a score of 10.d. A person with a score of 6 was three times as creative as a person with a score of 2 and a person with a score of 5 was half as creative as someone with a score of 10.e. All of these choices are correct conclusions
Answer: A person with a score of 6 was more creative than a person with a score of 5
Step-by-step explanation: The Thurstone scale is usually employed in the representation of non-numerical attributes such as creativity, like or dislike, understanding and so on. in a numerical format usually in questionnaires or surveys in other to denote the level of agreement or disagreement with the statement or create ranking. However, despite being represented in numerical format to create distinction and processing. Variables measured cannot be subjected to mathematical calculation.
In the scenario above, creativity is represented in numerical format to show the level of creativity such that individuals with higher numbers are deemed more creative than those with lesser figures. However, it is wrong to Infer that an individual with creativity score of 6 is twice as creative as those with a creativity of 3.
IT just shows that individuals with 6 are more creativity than those with 5 and so on.
A random sample is a poll in which the individuals who are taking the poll are not specific or biased. In this case it is a specific group of people, people who'se house number ends with 1
to the nearest hundredth