1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
babunello [35]
3 years ago
7

What were the historical purposes and consequences of Thomas Paine‘s common sense

History
1 answer:
Artyom0805 [142]3 years ago
6 0

<u>Answer:</u>

Thomas Paine wrote about common sense because he wanted the common people of the thirteen colonies which were under the British to fight for their independence from the authority of the British people.

Paine, in his pamphlet wrote certain political and moral talks which could encourage these common people. This resulted in the pamphlet having a great impact on the people to fight for the cause for which this was written.

You might be interested in
What is a stalemats​
labwork [276]

Noun /

a position counting as draw in which a player is not I'll N check but cannot move except into check .

Verb #bring or cause to reach stalemate.

7 0
3 years ago
Something is considered to be in free fall when gravity is pushing up on it and no other forces are acting on it.
QveST [7]
It has to be false gravity doesn't  push up it pulls down

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
1. What was going in the United States and the world in the late 1980's?​
Ivanshal [37]

Answer:

the aids crisis

Explanation:

everyone had aids and the government ignored it

6 0
3 years ago
What did Chief Watie and Chief Ross disagree over regarding freedmen?
GaryK [48]
<span>Aftermath. One year later, however, in Worcester v. Georgia, 31 U.S. 515 (1832), theU.S. Supreme Court ruled that the Cherokee Nation was sovereign. According to the decision rendered by Justice John Marshall, this meant that Georgia had no rights to enforce state laws in its territory.</span><span>
</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
HEY CAN ANYONE PLS ANSWER DIS!
bearhunter [10]

Explanation: No, this shouldn't be a law because if a theif overcomes you in a fight because you cant use a weapon then he could kill you. The theif is also a criminal not worthy of this life if he wants to steal, so killing him wouldnt be as big of a problem. If the theif runs away with items then using a weapon could stop him.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is the difference in separation of powers and checks and balances?
    11·1 answer
  • Which phrase indicates that the colonists are protesting their lack of representation? A.) "Among [certain unalienable rights] a
    12·2 answers
  • An example of a tertiary source is
    8·2 answers
  • In the late 1800's ladies were given a red rose at a fashionable Louisville Derby party, resulting in the flower’s adoption as p
    11·2 answers
  • What is another name for the ten commandments​
    8·2 answers
  • For quartering large bodies of armed troops among us.
    10·1 answer
  • Which phrase best defines laissez-faire?
    10·2 answers
  • A. B. C. or D? .....​
    9·1 answer
  • How has civil rights impacted your life today?
    15·1 answer
  • WILL MARK BRAINLIEST!!!!!!!!
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!