1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
slava [35]
3 years ago
15

6. When a price goes up, consumers are more likely to do what?

History
2 answers:
ollegr [7]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

B

Explanation:

According to the law of demand, when price goes up, consumers are less likely to buy the product.

Sphinxa [80]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

The answer is A.Buy more

Explanation:

when consumers see that something is worth a lot they buy because the reason the price is high is because the product is good and the supply is likely to increase.

You might be interested in
Pick one region that the United States acquired as part of Manifest Destiny, such as Texas or California. List three ways that t
borishaifa [10]

Answer:

California, the Louisiana Purchase, The Texas Independence  and The Coining of 'Manifest Destiny'

Explanation:

They were all apart of it

6 0
3 years ago
John Locke thought that people were neither good nor bad innately. How did Hobbes’s views differ from those of Locke’s?
Vladimir [108]

Answer:  A) Hobbes thought  people were innately violent.

<u>Further explanation</u>:

Both English philosophers believed there is a "social contract" -- that governments are formed by the will of the people.  But their theories on why people want to live under governments were very different.

Thomas Hobbes published his political theory in <em>Leviathan </em> in 1651, following the chaos and destruction of the English Civil War.  He saw human beings as naturally suspicious of one another, in competition with each other, and violent toward one another as a result.  Forming a government meant giving up personal liberty, but gaining security against what would otherwise be a situation of every person at war with every other person.

John Locke published his <em>Two Treatises on Civil Government </em>in 1690, following the mostly peaceful transition of government power that was the Glorious Revolution in England.  Locke believed people are born as blank slates--with no preexisting knowledge or moral leanings.  Experience then guides them to the knowledge and the best form of life, and they choose to form governments to make life and society better.

In teaching the difference between Hobbes and Locke, I've often put it this way.  If society were playground basketball, Hobbes believed you must have a referee who sets and enforces rules, or else the players will eventually get into heated arguments and bloody fights with one another, because people get nasty in competition that way.   Locke believed you could have an enjoyable game of playground basketball without a referee, but a referee makes the game better because then any disputes that come up between players have a fair way of being resolved.    Of course, Hobbes and Locke never actually wrote about basketball -- a game not invented until 1891 in America by James Naismith.  But it's just an illustration I've used to try to show the difference of ideas between Hobbes and Locke.   :-)

7 0
3 years ago
What did the Townshend Acts tax?
lys-0071 [83]
B) imports

The Townsend acts taxed imports, such as tea, they wanted to receive revenue from colonists. 
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did industrial revolution influence the class structure of western europe?
jasenka [17]
What book is this from?
5 0
3 years ago
‘The Treaty of Versailles was unfair on Germany.' How far do you agree with this statement? Explain your answer”
Paraphin [41]

Answer:

It can be viewed in opposite opinions, so I'll do both, and you can choose which one you use- you could use both, which would detail your answer more, and ensure you get top marks.

Explanation:

On one hand, I disagree that the Treaty of Versailles was unfair on Germany. After majorly contributing to the start of World War I, causing mass destruction to numerous countries, they deserved a severe punishment to face their consequences, which included reparations, loss of their territory, and regulations on the size of their army. It was right for them to be punished so harshly, so they could learn not to cross the Allies again.

On the other hand, I agree that the Treaty of Versailles was unfair on Germany. Despite contributing to a war, every country was involved, so it is not right Germany are the ones getting severely punished. The punishments are too harsh and majorly damaged the country's economy, and I feel this is too hard on Germany.

Hope this helps!

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • which statement reflects an argument of enlightenment philosophers against the belief in the divine right of kings
    12·1 answer
  • During the middle ages, islamic scholars made key advancements in?
    11·2 answers
  • *<br> 4. What is Camp Green Lake?
    6·1 answer
  • What was King's father's profession? <br> a. doctor <br> b. fireman <br> c. pastor <br> d. professor
    8·1 answer
  • AP US History question:
    14·1 answer
  • How are vulteres a problem
    15·1 answer
  • 1.
    7·1 answer
  • One goal of the National Labor Relations Board was to:
    5·2 answers
  • Please help mee I need helpppp
    12·1 answer
  • What does the quote of "The capitalist system being discredited and destroys the world" means.
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!