Answer:
Citizens showed a renewed interest in communism.
Explanation:
I mean, if they lived and saw first-hand how communism actually worked, and saw that it was a failure, while would they have "renewed interest" in it, when capitalism gave them a better lifestyle?
Sepoy Rebellion
Formation of the Indian National Congress
Formation of the British East India Company
Complete British colonization of India
(Take this response with a grain of salt.)
I personally think that neither should determine that. Both questions are unable to determine whether the religion is true; so why would it be used to determine whether or not people have the right to follow it. However, putting that aside, I think the best answer would be how good their followers are. It doesn't determine whether the religion is true or not but it rids us of the toxic religions that spread negative messages. Considering how much racism, homophobia, transphobia, and sexism is in most religions it'd be interesting to see most religions cease.
Including commonly followed religions like Catholicism.
The correct answer is " Citizens would be able to form governments that ensure their interests."
The idea of a social contract involves citizens of a country giving up some of their individual liberties (aka freedoms) so that the government can make society safer. Hobbes argued that this social contract, despite the fact that it limits individual freedoms, will benefit citizens because they have the opportunity to pick their leaders who will make laws based around their wants/needs.
(1)Hitler: The Rise of Evil (2) Good (3) Elser (4)The Pianists (5) City of Life and Death (6) John Rabe (7)The Children of Huang Shi
