In Kant’s time, peasants would sometimes sell their teeth to wealthier individuals who needed them. Kant objected to this, and h
e would presumably, for similar reasons, object to selling organs (like kidneys) in the present day. Which of following most accurately characterizes Kant’s reasons for objecting to selling parts of one’s body? a) The pain caused by having a tooth or an organ extracted is severe — severe enough to outweigh the pleasure that the recipient will enjoy. b) Extracting teeth and organs is digusting, and, therefore, morally wrong. c) Extracting teeth and organs inherently involves a certain amount of risk. Something could go wrong, and the procedure could result in infection, further illness, or death. Kant says that we are not allowed to take risks with our lives. d) By selling part of her body, a person would be treating herself as a mere means, and not as an end in herself. e) An individual’s body is owned by God, and so she is not free to do with it whatever she wishes. God has ultimate ownership over her body, and so selling a tooth or an organ would require selling something that one does not actually own.
b) Extracting teeth and organs is disgusting, and, therefore, morally wrong.
Explanation:
Immanuel Kant was a Prussian Philosopher whose works had an influence on the society. In one of his works on morality, he argued on the ethical and unethical stands on some of the actions done by people.
<em>One of them being the buying of teeth by the wealthy individual from poor peasant people. He was so repelled by the buying and selling of teeth that he declared it was under all circumstances immoral.</em>
Patent prints are those fingerprints that are easily spotted without the use of magnesium powders, ultra violet lights or chemicals that might assist in the visualisation of such a print. Patent prints are often found perhaps in blood, ink, oil or on surfaces such as glass, wooden door frames or paper.
Yes i think this is right. Many successful criminal prosecutions in the United States end not with jury trials. Instead this gives a defendant a chance for a shorter sentence, especially if the defendant is not guilty. Agreeing to plead guilty to some or all of the charges against them in exchange for concessions from the prosecutors. These agreements allow prosecutors to focus their time and resources on other cases, and reduce the number of trials that judges need to oversee.
42 U.S.C Section 1997 e(e) states that inmates must first exhaust all administrative remedies that are available to them before they may bring their claim to federal court
