Answer:
There will be <em>no depreciation (shift)</em> <em>because</em> it is not an open market FX floating rate exchange
Explanation:
All over the world, some countries operate <em>floating rate exchange policy</em> in which the value of <em>a currency increases or decreases based on demand and supply in the forex market.</em>
In the case of <em>Central African CFA</em> (XAF), there would <em>not be a shift in the value of the currency in the FX market as a result of the currency value being controlled rigidly (Non-floating rate exchange method) irrespective of the political scandal in some areas of the region or not. </em>This is also similar to the situation where by a country in the CFA region still has a <em>stable currency exchange rate against Euro irrespective of the terrorism activities or economic situation they are passing through at that particular point in time.</em>
A democracy is "the rule of the people" which means that the actual will of the people determines the laws.
This means that people have the right to express their opinions, no matter what they are: so disagreeing on anything is allowed.
This is correct!
The U.S. Supreme Court hands down its decision on Sanford v. Dred Scott, a case that intensified national divisions over the issue of slavery.
In 1834, Dred Scott, a slave, had been taken to Illinois, a free state, and then Wisconsin territory, where the Missouri Compromise of 1820 prohibited slavery. Scott lived in Wisconsin with his master, Dr. John Emerson, for several years before returning to Missouri, a slave state. In 1846, after Emerson died, Scott sued his master’s widow for his freedom on the grounds that he had lived as a resident of a free state and territory. He won his suit in a lower court, but the Missouri supreme court reversed the decision. Scott appealed the decision, and as his new master, J.F.A. Sanford, was a resident of New York, a federal court decided to hear the case on the basis of the diversity of state citizenship represented. After a federal district court decided against Scott, the case came on appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court, which was divided along slavery and antislavery lines; although the Southern justices had a majority.
During the trial, the antislavery justices used the case to defend the constitutionality of the Missouri Compromise, which had been repealed by the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854. The Southern majority responded by ruling on March 6, 1857, that the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional and that Congress had no power to prohibit slavery in the territories. Three of the Southern justices also held that African Americans who were slaves or whose ancestors were slaves were not entitled to the rights of a federal citizen and therefore had no standing in court. These rulings all confirmed that, in the view of the nation’s highest court, under no condition did Dred Scott have the legal right to request his freedom. The Supreme Court’s verdict further inflamed the irrepressible differences in America over the issue of slavery, which in 1861 erupted with the outbreak of the American Civil War.
The CGE's functions include: monitoring and evaluating the policies and practices of government, the private sector and other organisations to ensure that they promote and protect gender equality; public education and information; reviewing existing and upcoming legislation from a gender perspective; investigating . The mission of the Commission for Gender Equality (CGE) is to promote respect for gender equality and the protection, development and attainment of gender equality. The CGE advances, promotes and protects gender equality in South Africa through undertaking research, public education, policy development, legislative initiatives, effective monitoring and litigation.
Answer: positive reinforcement
Explanation:Reinforcement is defined as increase in a behavior. Reinforcement is usually positive or negative. Positve reinforcement is when needed or advantageous stimulus is added to increase ones behavior or character.
positive reinforcement entails adding a reinforcing stimulus to a behavior that empowes the behavior to occuror appear again in the nearby future. Example is when you reward a child for a performing a particular task, the child will love to do that particular task often so as to get the reward. This can help the child to have the behavior you want him to develop and most times even when there is no reward the childs behavior is altered or changed already to always perform that task.
