Answer: $2197570
Explanation:
The cost estimate is prepared below:
Base cost = $101.15 × 18525 = $1873804
Add: Site work cost = $180000
Total = $1,873,804 + $180,000 = $2053804
Add: Design fees = 7% × $2053804 = 0.07 × $2053804 = $143766
Estimated cost = $2053804 + $143766 = $2197570
The range or percentage of this cost will be +50%.
1. Memorable
Dissection is an interesting approach to take when teaching science. For one, it creates a long-lasting impression on the students’ minds. Most people can remember what they did in the lab yesterday easily than some theory they have just gone through. So it is easy to recall an activity that you have engaged in that is why dissecting in equally important as the theory aspect of the lesson.
2. Proper understanding
Another obvious reason why dissection is important is because it is a hands-on activity which provides a chance for students to carry out investigations aside from what they learn in class. They are able to test how truthful their theory is while comparing it to what they see while carrying out the dissection.
3. Tactile experienceThere are rules on how dissection is carried out and these are among the many things that students are taught about before they begin any dissections. There are also certain tools which are needed for dissection and which tools differ from one creature to another. Armed with this information and proper guidance and practice, students are able to acquire proper dissection skills which will no doubt be useful in higher level science lab classes
Answer:
$4,265.55
Explanation:
Future value = $120,000
Interest rate (i) = 5%
Annual deposit = ?
Time period (n) = 18 year
Since deposit are to be made at the beginning of each year, hence the relevant factor table to be used is future value annuity due factor table.
Future value = Annual deposit x future value annuity due factor (i%, n)
120,000 = Annual deposit x FVADF (5%, 18period)
120,000 = Annual deposit x 28.13238
Annual deposit = 120,000/28.13238
=$4,265.547
=$4,265.55
Team bonding through the subjugation of junior members is not valid. Junior members should be encouraged by the senior members to strive for the team, not belittled or humiliated in the process. Different people assume comradery in different ways, some through degradation or laughter, and others through positivity and cohesiveness, but subjugation and humiliation should never be a factor when building teams, especially in today’s society since we live in such a diverse culture in this country. If an organization relied on humiliating banter in order to form a collective unit, then it shows that the organization is less cohesive and reflects poor management and leadership skills within the organization.
Hi there
The journal entry would be
debit to telephone expense for $300
Credit to cash for $300
Good luck!
