The English colonies PR great Britain in total it was 13 colonies
<span>Saul and Solomon, were kings of Israel and their stories have something in common: both committed sins during their respective reigns; sins that ignited anger God. In 1050 BC Samuel designated Saul as the 1 King of Israel. He had infinite military successes, but his PRIDE made him lose the favor of God, his heart was attacked by envy. He was envious of David (the new one chosen by God) and even tried to kill him. Envy filled Saul's heart with hatred and caused his soon end. Solomon, was a wise king, son of David and Bathsheba, widow of Uriah. Solomon inherits his father's kingdom. Endowed with the wisdom that God gave him, that is to say "a listening heart", however, the Bible says that he had 700 women and 300 concubines, most of them from other nations. They brought their own religion, their idolatrous cults and made Solomon's heart begin to move away from God, as did Saul.</span>
By appointing the chair and a majority of the members
Answer:
The rhetoric technique that Martin Luther King uses repeatedly in the above text is the use of similes and the use of figurative language.
Explanation:
Similes are speech techniques that use the comparison of two variables interestingly.
Figurative language is the use of a word to mean differently to its custom meaning.
<em>Martin Luther King uses Socrates and Jesus figuratively to explain his ideas, since, they are not part of his topic, but have similar traits as the situation he is trying to explain, this is an example of figurative language in the above excerpt.</em>
Martin Luther in this excerpt uses similes multiple times to bring out his points.
Some of the instances where he uses similes are;
- Isn't this like condemning Socrates because his unswerving commitment to truth and his philosophical inquiries
- Isn't this like condemning Jesus because his unique God consciousness and never ceasing devotion to God's will precipitated the evil act of crucifixion?
This questions help him explain his point, it also makes the people understand his point out of the comparison of what they know to what they do not know.
Safety reasons is not a reason why nations conquered and created empires in the lands.
These nations conquered lands for different reasons
- For economic reasons. They conquered lands because of trade reasons and also to get the raw materials that were in these areas
- Religious reasons. The spread of Christianity was a reason for colonization
- Military reasons, The colonists arrived in America to escape warfare in their own countries.
- Philosophical ideologies was also a reason
- Political reasons was also part of the reasons for colonization
Read more on brainly.com/question/2074154?referrer=searchResults
