Answer:
b) y = 289.815 when ![x_1 = 180 \text{ and } x_2 = 310](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=x_1%20%3D%20180%20%5Ctext%7B%20and%20%7D%20x_2%20%3D%20310)
Step-by-step explanation:
We are given the following information in the question:
![y = 29.1270 + 0.5906x_1 + 0.4980x_2](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=y%20%3D%2029.1270%20%2B%200.5906x_1%20%2B%200.4980x_2)
where y is the dependent variable,
are the independent variable.
The multiple regression equation is of the form:
![y = b_0 + b_1x_1 + b_2x_2](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=y%20%3D%20b_0%20%2B%20b_1x_1%20%2B%20b_2x_2)
where,
: is the intercept of the equation and is the value of dependent variable when all the independent variable are zero.
: It is the slope coefficient of the independent variable
.
: It is the slope coefficient of the independent variable
.
- The regression coefficient in multiple regression is the slope of the linear relationship between the dependent and the part of a predictor variable that is independent of all other predictor variables.
Comparing the equations, we get:
![b_1 = 0.5906\\b_2 = 0.4980](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=b_1%20%3D%200.5906%5C%5Cb_2%20%3D%200.4980)
- This means holding
constant, a change of one in
is associated with a change of 0.5906 in the dependent variable.
- This means holding
constant, a change of 1 in
is associated with a change of 0.4980 in the dependent variable.
b) We have to estimate the value of y
![y = 29.1270 + 0.5906(180) + 0.4980(310) = 289.815](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=y%20%3D%2029.1270%20%2B%200.5906%28180%29%20%2B%200.4980%28310%29%20%3D%20289.815)
<span>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GjYL0-BlejI So, to answer your question yes.</span>
Answer:
28, 29, and 30
Step-by-step explanation:
There's probably better ways but you can estimate by knowing 30*3=90 so it should be somewhere pretty close to 30. Guess and check with basic calculations to get 28, 29, and 30.
Reasons:
1. Because, MO cuts Angle PMN in two equal parts.
2.As ∠PMN is cut in to equal parts thus:
∠PMN = ∠NMO + ∠PMO, where these two parts (∠NMO, ∠PMO) are equal.
3. Both are the same, common you can say..
4. Because, MO cuts Angle PON in two equal parts.
5. As ∠PON is cut in to equal parts thus:
∠PON = ∠NOM + ∠POM, where these two parts (∠NOM , ∠POM) are equal.
6. From the above statements, we have:
= ∠NMO + ∠PMO (Proved)
= ∠NOM + ∠POM (Proved)
= MO = MO (Proved)
Thus, ∆PMO ≅ ∆NMO, by AAS rule
________________________________
As simpoool as that!
Answer:
don't search link
Step-by-step explanation: