Ask question

Ask question

All categories

4 years ago

7

francine uses 2/3 cup of pineapple juice for every 1/3 cups of orange juice to make a smoothie. How many cups of pineapple juice

does francine use for 1 cup orange juice.

1 answer:

amm18124 years ago

8 0

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Well three 1/3 cups makes 1cup

And 1 and a half 2/3 cups makes 1 cup

SO she uses 1 and a half cups for 1 cup of orange juice

You might be interested in

(True or false)<br><br><br> Please help me

sashaice [31]

Answer:

False

Step-by-step explanation:

The slope in the graph is not negative.

The correct equation for the graph would be $y = \frac{3}{2} x+3$

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Write and solve a proportion to answer the question.

kari74 [83]

Answer:

$a = 25\% \: of \: 78 \\ a =\frac{25}{100} \times 78 \\ a = \frac{1}{4}\times 78 \\ \boxed{a = 19.5}$

<h3><u>a=19.5</u> is the right answer.</h3>

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

6/15=2/c what is c equal

ohaa [14]

If 6/15 = 2/c, then c = 5

7 0

4 years ago

Solve: m/9=2/3<br><br> This is for 6th grade math

SSSSS [86.1K]

Answer:

m=6

Step-by-step explanation:

2/3 = 6/9

9 divided by 3 = 3

3 + 3 = 6

therefore your answer is 6

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Use logical equivalences (not a truth table) to reduce p → (q − p) to a tautology t. In other words, you should transform p → (q

schepotkina [342]

Answer:

The statement $p\rightarrow (q\rightarrow p)$ is a tautology.

$p\rightarrow (q\rightarrow p)\equiv \lnot p\lor (q\rightarrow p) \equiv \lnot p\lor (\lnot q\lor p) \equiv (p\lor \lnot p) \lor \lnot q \equiv T \lor \lnot q \equiv T$

Step-by-step explanation:

We have the following statement:

$p\rightarrow (q\rightarrow p)$

To reduce the statement to a tautology we need to use the table of logical equivalences as follows:

$p\rightarrow (q\rightarrow p)\equiv$

$\equiv \lnot p\lor (q\rightarrow p)$ by the the logical equivalence involving conditional statement.

$\equiv \lnot p\lor (\lnot q\lor p)$ by the the logical equivalence involving conditional statement.

$\equiv (p\lor \lnot p) \lor \lnot q$ by the Associative law.

$\equiv T \lor \lnot q$ by the Negation law.

$\equiv T$ by the Domination law.

7 0

3 years ago