Answer:
The data does not provide sufficient evidence to conclude that Kenneth's mean stacking time is less than 8.2 seconds.
Do not reject the null hypothesis because the p-value 0.0401 is greater than the significance level.
Step-by-step explanation:
Null hypothesis (H0): mu = 8.2 seconds
Alternate hypothesis (Ha): mu < 8.2 seconds
Significance level = 0.04
p-value = 0.0401
Using the p-value approach for testing hypothesis, do not reject H0 because the p-value 0.0401 is greater than the significance level 0.04.
There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that Kenneth's mean stacking time is less than 8.2 seconds.
1/34
step-by-step-explanation
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
3+
Answer:


Step-by-step explanation:
To solve this exercise you must keep on mind that according to the exponents rules:


1) Therefore, you can write 216 as:
Because:
2) Descompose the number 216 into its prime factors, then:

Then you can write the number 216 as 
3) You can also write 216 as following:

Answer:
1/3
Step-by-step explanation:
4/5 + 3/15
We first find a common denominator which will be 15.
Multiplying the top and bottom of 4/5, we have 12/15
12/15 + 3/15 = 15/15 = 1
1 - 2/3 is 1/3