The south winning would be a <em>huge</em> issue in itself, and if they continued to use slaves when the Industrial Revolution came around, there wouldn't be a need for slaves, and the vast expansion of the slave trade would shrink by a lot- as the US wouldn't need them.
Here's the problem:
If we're going into counterfactual history, we have to keep a lot of things in mind.
Was the Industrial Revolution sparked because there were no more slaves? If they still had slaves, would it not have been necessary to obtain and invent machines?
Would we be the United States? Would be have gone at war again from the North still being against slavery? Keep these things in mind.
Hopefully this helped!
Answer:
the house of represenitives and the senate
Explanation:
Thomas Jefferson said “—That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles, and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness… it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.”
Answer:
Colonialism hindered a developing country's level of development. ... There was investment in colonies, but this was focused on things that would help the trade between the countries. Borders of some colonial countries were set without attention to tribal and cultural differences, causing tensions and instability.
Explanation:
