1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Hoochie [10]
3 years ago
7

What laws closed Boston harbor and then placed Massachusetts under military rule?

History
1 answer:
Ludmilka [50]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

The correct answer is C. The Coercive Acts closed Boston harbor and then placed Massachusetts under military rule.

Explanation:

The Coercive Laws was the name given by the settlers of the Thirteen Colonies to a series of laws promulgated by the British Parliament in 1774. These laws triggered outrage and resistance in the colonies and were a major factor in the growth of the American revolution.

One of these laws closed the Boston harbor and gave the governor of Massachusetts exceptional powers; the colonists would bear the expenses of the English forces in America and the trial of English officials would be outside the jurisdiction of the colonies.

You might be interested in
It may be a reflection on human nature, that such devices [checks and balances] should be necessary to control the abuses of gov
docker41 [41]

Answer:

1 humans need guidance

2 prevent government abuse

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Helpppppppppp plzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz urgenttttttttt
Snowcat [4.5K]

Answer:

Where's the picture/question?

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In the 1790s, Spain stopped funding the Texas missions because they wanted the churches to support themselves
Natali [406]
Not true they didn’t do such thing
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following statements would Karl Marx be less likely to agree with than would Adam Smith?
sweet-ann [11.9K]
The statement about how Karl Marx and Adam Smith are different would be:

Adam Smith and Karl Marx are polar opposites in the political-economic, in such that Smith would in no way agree<span> with a revolution of the proletariat.

I hope my answer has come to your help. God bless and have a nice day ahead!
</span>

6 0
3 years ago
Why is it so hard to define terrorism by the means alone without also considering goals? according to byford, what should the am
natulia [17]
Please do not delte this comment.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did pancho villa create an image of himself as leader of the people?
    11·2 answers
  • Which parts of this excerpt from Abraham Lincoln’s First Inaugural Address indicate that he was trying to calm those who feared
    8·2 answers
  • What of the following best describes the shift in art and literature that occurred during the European renaissance
    14·1 answer
  • What statement best describes the US welfare system in 1930?
    6·2 answers
  • The greek and roman civilizations that we call​
    12·1 answer
  • The Pharaoh was assisted in governing by
    15·2 answers
  • Between 10 and 12 million enslaved Africans were brought to the americas over the course of_____years
    10·1 answer
  • In the seventeenth century, the Hapsburg Empire
    9·1 answer
  • Delilah helped Samson to be very strong.<br><br><br> TrueFalse
    6·2 answers
  • How is strong commission government formed
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!