Answer:
Himalayas
Explanation:
my understanding is he was a man of great peace and patience. a mountaintop such as this Himalayas I think would provide both
Answer:
1. The Romans and Jews had different religion
2. The Romans had come and conquered the land of the Jews
3. The Romans were killing the Jews so they would follow the religion
Explanation:
This is why they had conflict
Hope this helped c: <3
Answer:
Explanation:
In the 1800s, lots of change was occurring in the United States.
- The rise of factories and industrialization expanded the textile industry. It needed more cotton.
- The invention of the cotton gin helped meet the demand for cotton. It made production faster and cheaper.
- The demand for cotton continued to increase, so plantation owners continued to expand their land and grow more.
However, they couldn't expand forever without touching Native American land. So, the Indian Removal Act was passed in 1830. It <u>forced</u> the Natives off their land and into reservations west of the Mississippi River. Their sacred lands became plantations.
Based on this information, the best answer choice is <u>A. Relocate American Indians and to provided land for white settlers</u>
Heavyweight champion who defeated "bonecrusher" smith
- IRONMIKE
Answer:
it was huge
Explanation:
West Virginia before the Ohio County Women's Republican Club, McCarthy blamed Acheson, whom he called "this pompous diplomat in striped pants", for the "loss of China", making the sensationalist claim: "While I cannot take the time to name all of the men in the State Department who have been named as members of the Communist Party and members of a spy ring, I have here in my hand a list of 205...a list of names that were known to the Secretary of State and who nevertheless are still working and shaping the policy of the State Department".[10] The speech, which McCarthy repeated shortly afterwards in Salt Lake City, made him into a national figure.[11] In the early 1950s, the Truman administration was attacked for the "loss" of China with Senator McCarthy charging in a 1950 speech that "Communists and queers" in the State Department, whom President Harry S. Truman had allegedly tolerated, were responsible for the "loss" of China.[12] In a speech that said much about fears of American masculinity going "soft" that were common in the 1950s, McCarthy charged that "prancing minions of the Moscow party line" had been in charge of policy towards China in the State Department while the Secretary of State Dean Acheson was a "dilettante diplomat who cringed before the Soviet colossus".[12]
The report of the Senate Internal Security Subcommittee in 1951 written by Senator Pat McCarran concluded that China was indeed "lost" because of the policy followed by the State Department, declaring: "Owen Lattimore and John Carter Vincent were influential in bringing about a change in United States policy...favorable to the Chinese Communists".[13] Through McCarran was careful not to call Lattimore a Soviet spy in his report, which would have allowed him to sue for libel, he came very close with the statement: "Owen Lattimore was, from some time beginning in the 1930s, a conscious, articulate instrument of the Soviet conspiracy".[14] In response to the McCarran report; the Washington Post declared in an editorial attacked the thesis
