The answer would be A. Determining the date of its creation.
Answer:
The Vietnam War can be considered a "proxy" war in the Cold War. Although the Soviet Union and the United States did not directly go to war, they each supported a different side in the war. The Viet Cong were Vietnamese rebels in the South who fought against the Southern Vietnam government and the United States.
Explanation:
PLEASE GIVE ME BRAINLIEST IF YOUR NEW IT SHOULD SAY NEAR MY ANSWER MARK AS BRAINLIEST AND IF NOT YOULL HAVE TO WAIT A DAY AND BRAINLY WILL REMIND YOU
C) Texas sought to gain independence from Mexico, due to Mexico's government changing from a democracy to a dictatorship.
Texas saw the laws in Mexico as arbitrary and tyrannic in many ways. It reminded them of how British used to treat the colonies, maybe worse. They did not want to follow the rules of Mexico.
Answer:
Correct answer is C) African tribes exchanged captive Africans with European slave traders, who transported them to the Americas under inhumane conditions.
Explanation:
Option A is not correct as in general not so many Indians crossed Atlantic Ocean in general, and were not part of the Atlantic slave trade.
B is not correct as Africans were not brought there to built their settlement, but to work as slaves.
C is correct as this is the best definition of slave trade. Slaves were sold in West Africa and sent to the New World, where they would work, mostly on plantation, and were treated as they were not human.
D is not correct as this was not the case, and was not included in this process.
This is how I would go: (I'm just glossing over it, sorry if you think it lacks detail. :L)
<span>1. California does not deserve a seat in the United Nations. </span>
<span>2. The UN is only for nations; people in California are US citizens; they do not have a culture nor a culture that is exclusive to the rest of the US. In this sense, California is not a nation. (this is the definition of a nation bit.) </span>
<span>3. Federalism, the system where states and national governments share power. California (states in general) does not have the power to enter into treaties with foreign countries, nor regulate commerce with foreign countries. These powers are exclusive to the national government. This would mean that it cannot be given a seat, where these powers would be put into California's hands. I guess states governments would also fit into here somewhere. </span>
