Explanation:
In simpler words, the multi-part question is asking for you to first analyze the three sources, then pick a side and have knowledge to defend your point on the question 'to what extent should nations pursue their national interests'.
In source 1, it shows that the majority of Canadians are opposed to sending troops to Afghanistan, with 36% voting for, 5% unsure, and 59% voting against.
Source two is clearly depicting the nazi's, at a rally held in Nuremberg. Although the source does not state if the protesters are pro or against Nazi regime, I am assuming they are pro. This would lead to the assumption that the people of Nuremberg are pro-Nazi empire.
The source 3 is a timeline, that goes from 1920 to 2005. This time period is very significant, because it captures many important battles, such as world war 2, Persian Gulf War, and the Iraq invasion.
After reading these three sources, you must decide if you think it is good for nations to pursue their national interests, or bad.
Hope this long explanation helped clarify the troubling question for you!
Answer:
Colonists began to move west, and American Indians lost land and power. ... They opposed it because they did not want the colonies to be united.
Answer:
7
Explanation:
In Sparta, boys were trained to be warriors at age 7.
Answer:
The first battle of Bull Run is considered the first major battle of the American Civil War. It occurred on July 21, 1861 and was fought near the Manassas railroad junction in the state of Virginia. This battle was named by the Union army after a stream that ran through the battlefield that was called Bull Run.
Explanation:
