Answer:
Positive Statements: 1st & 2nd ; Normative Statements: 3rd & 4th
Explanation:
Positive Economics is <u>objective</u> & <u>facts</u> based <u>actual</u> economic issue description , explaining verifiable phenomenas (causal relationships).
Normative Economics is <u>subjective</u> & opinion based conclusive <u>solutions</u> to economic issues, including '<u>ought to be</u>' unverifiable suggestions.
1. Lung cancer kills millions of people each year: reflects actual objective verifiable fact about an economic (health) issue.
2. Too many people smoke: denotes another actual objective variable fact connected to (potential cause of) the above economic (health) issue.
So , these two are Positive Statements.
3. If the government were to increase taxes on cigarettes, fewer people would smoke : Is subjective opinion based probable solution to the above economic (health) issue.
4. The government should increase taxes on cigarettes : Is an 'ought to' suggestion for an economic participant (govt) to solve the above economic (health) issue.
So , these two are Normative Statements
of every day scarcity could it be how the desert doesn't really have water so the desert has a scarcity of water scarcity is a basic economic problem that Society faces because the world sometimes runs out of things that we need so certain people have to make loopholes to get to get around them another example is how during the coronavirus we had a scarcity of sanitizer Clorox wipes bleach and toilet paper
B) Fiscal policy requires a short and contentious legislative process
Answer:
The total value of this firm if you ignore taxes is $16 million.
Explanation:
Considering that the company has decided to borrow $1 million to buy out the shares of a deceased stockholder who holds 2,500 shares, hence to calculate the total value of the firm we have to first make the following calculation:
$1,000,000÷2,500= 400
Hence, Total value of the firm= 400×40,000 shares of stock outstanding
= $16 million is the total value of this firm if you ignore taxes.