Answer:
D. significance, which measures how likely it is
Explanation:
Statistical significance is a claim that a result is the outcome of any chance or random act but rather it is instead, likely to be the outcome of a specific cause. This claim is important especially for academicians and researchers for they rely heavily on the analysis of data.
The best way to connect the two given sentences is to use the words or phrase <u>"significance, which measures how likely it is"</u>. The word <u>"which" acts as the connector</u> of the two sentences which have a related theme but also presents a different part of the objective.
Thus, the new sentence will read as-
In 2019, hundreds of scientists called for an end to reliance on statistical <em><u>significance, which measures how likely it is</u></em> that a result occurred by chance.
These passages refer to a tarde between Lewis clark and their team between a small Indian group. main idea 1: Lewis and Clark set on a voyage to make trade. 2: Lewis and Clark discuss with Indians advantages and disadvantages of their aid for our aid 3: Indians help and agree to terms and help for their voyage back home both sides equally satisfied
The way to writ an informative essay is first your attention grabber to get the reader interested, then you put your background information that introduces your claim, then 8 clear claim. if you want you could put two separate arguments and the reasons with effective matching evidence from reliable resources, word phrases and clauses to clarify the relationship between claims and reasons, citations that show the resources of your evidence, then you put an explanation of the other side and a strong counterclaim, lastly a call of action in your conclusion with passion.
Sentence 6: Some people believe that the government does not have the right to force people to be safe, and that these laws are unfair.
The counterargument in an essay is the argument that a person would make against the essay's overall claim. In this essay, the author is arguing for consistent seat belt laws across all states for both drivers and passengers. The author wants the government to get involved because seat belts save lives. The counterargument contradicts the author in that it argues that the government should not be the one deciding whether or not a person should be wearing a seat belt. Laws for seat belts are unfair as they infringe upon a person's rights.