My balance had to go up $30, since my current balance was $15,300 and the interest rate of 18% or 1.5% per month when I payed $200 this month.
Answer:
(a) = $468
(b) = 52%
(c) = $144
(d) = 28%
(e) = $1150
(f) = $920
Explanation:
selling price variable cost contribution margin contribution ratio
1. $900 $432 (a) $ (b)%
2. $200 $ (c) $56 (d)%
3. $ (e) $(f) $230 20%
contribution = selling price - variable costs
Margin contribution ratio = contribution / sales
Variable cost = selling price - contribution
Selling price = contribution / margin contribution ratio
Answer:
B) systematic risk
Explanation:
Federal Reserve changes in monetary policies affect the entire securities market hence considered a Systematic risk. It is also known as the Non-diversifiable risk ; it cannot be diversified away unlike stock specific or industry specific risk(unsystematic ) which can be eliminated through diversification.
Systematic risk is unavoidable and may be difficult to predict. Other examples include increase in long term interest rates, recessions or wars. Additionally, Investors are only compensated for systematic risk and not for diversifiable risk.
Answer:
b. strive to cut costs and increase efficiency.
Explanation:
Theory X managers is pessimistic. They believe people are lazy and unproductive. They will look to implement politics to increase the productivity,.
Please find full question attached
Answer and Explanation:
I will use Apple and HP in this comparison.Here I would compare Apple's laptop to that of Hewlet Packard as this is where they meet in the industry. Apple employs a strategy of differentiation and standing out in competition through their products. They aim to create products that are quite different and unique/innovative from other products in the market, and yet what the customer wants. In doing this, Apple has a trade-off for cost as they charge alot higher for their products than their competitors. HP on the other hand focus on making the best possible products that get the job done/meet the needs of customers while also being affordable. HP is more focused on affordable devices for their market and therefore have a different market segment for laptops from that of Apple. There is a trade-off for cost and market segment in this comparison