All categories

4 years ago

If the Federal Reserve were to change from an expansionary to a contractionary monetary

Business

1 answer:

zzz [600]4 years ago

6 0

Answer:

B) systematic risk

Explanation:

Federal Reserve changes in monetary policies affect the entire securities market hence considered a Systematic risk. It is also known as the Non-diversifiable risk ; it cannot be diversified away unlike stock specific or industry specific risk(unsystematic ) which can be eliminated through diversification.

Systematic risk is unavoidable and may be difficult to predict. Other examples include increase in long term interest rates, recessions or wars. Additionally, Investors are only compensated for systematic risk and not for diversifiable risk.

Read more about operating decisions

brainly.com/question/7203762

#SPJ1

4 0

2 years ago

When a domestic country is small relative to world markets, is a price taker, and its consumption and production do not affect t

Vlada [557]

When a domestic country is small relative to world markets,is a price taker and its consumption and production do not affect the world price,it can be studied using macroeconomic variables.

Given that a domestic country is small relative to world markets, is a price taker, and its consumption and production do not affect the world price.

We are required to give a way to study the effect of size of country on the world prices.

The prices depend on the size of the country. The country which is big in size can manipulate the prices by changing the supply of the goods whereas the country which is not much big cannot change the prices. The demand and supply of international prices are the macroeconomic variables.So to study the effect of size of country on the prices,we need to study these variables.

Hence when a domestic country is small relative to world markets,is a price taker and its consumption and production do not affect the world price,it can be studied using macroeconomic variables.

Learn more about macroeconomics at brainly.com/question/15430721

#SPJ4

5 0

2 years ago

Legal ownership in one country does not necessarily mean ownership in other countries

Nonamiya [84]

The statement above is TRUE.
In common law countries, ownership of an intellectual property is established by prior use while in code law countries ownership is established by the registration of that property. Which means that legal ownership in one country does not necessarily mean ownership in other countries.

7 0

3 years ago

g The Nite Lite Factory produces two products - small lamps and desk lamps. It has two separate departments - finishing and prod

almond37 [142]

Answer:

$7.20

Explanation:

Given the following :

FINISHING department :

overhead budget = $550,000

direct labor HOURS = 500,000

PRODUCTION department :

overhead budget = $400,000

direct labor hours = 80,000

Predetermined allocation rate for finishing department :

Overhead / allocation base = ($550,000 / 500,000) = $1.10 per direct labor hour

Predetermined allocation rate for production department :

Overhead / allocation base = ($400,000 / 80,000) = $5 per direct labor hour

If the budget estimates that a desk lamp will require 2 hours of finishing and 1 hour of production:

Finishing department :

(2 × Predetermined allocation rate for finishing department)

= (2 × $1.10) = $2.20

Production :

(1 × Predetermined allocation rate for production department)

= (1 × $5). = $5

Total = ($2.20 + $5) = $7.20

3 0

3 years ago

If Lorenzo stands up at a concert he can see the performance better. He therefore concludes if everyone stood up, everyone could

Lemur [1.5K]

Answer:

The correct answer is letter "B": The statement presents the fallacy of composition.

Explanation:

The Fallacy of composition refers to a fallacy by which an individual believes that something is true just because part of the whole is true. Typically, this type of belief leads to mistaken conclusions because what might be right for one person does not necessarily is right for others.

6 0

3 years ago