Answer:
The pertinent focuses for Dan Jacobs choice are referenced beneath.
- The new hardware would cost GreenLife $4,500,000
-
The new hardware would twofold the creation yield of the old apparatus
The expense of new hardware and the expansion in the creation yield by 100% are the future expenses and incomes and thus they are significant for dynamic.
The old apparatus is bought previously. Consequently, the price tag of the old apparatus is immaterial for dynamic procedure. Tho director ought to consider the resale estimation of old apparatus in the dynamic. Tho resale estimation of old apparatus ought to be deducted from the expense of new hardware so as to ascertain the net money surge to buy the new apparatus.
The director ought to set up an expense and advantage examination or ascertain NPV (net present estimation) of the venture (capital planning investigation) to introduce it before the leader of the organization. The extra costs identified with extra creation ought to likewise be thought of. This investigation would support the supervisor and the president in dissecting that whether they should buy the new machine or not.
Answer:
D : All options are correct
Explanation:
- The marginal buyer is the essence of demand curve while marginal seller is essence of supply curve.
- @ Q = 500 units, Selling Price is set at SP = $35
- @ Q = 500 units, Buying Price is set at BP = $40
- Since, SP ≠ BP our equilibrium price would be $ 37.5 assuming the price elasticity of demand and supply are equal. In any case the equilibrium price would lie in between [ 35 , 40 ] such that to prevent a shortage of units in near future.
- Moreover, if the seller decides to sell at price $35 then he must sell goods greater than 500 units to reach the equilibrium profits. However, it could also lead to excess of units or surplus.
- We see that from selling the goods at SP = $35 while the buyer is willing to pay BP = $40 for 500 goods, the seller would be under-profiting and would be earning $5*500 = $2,500 less than he would at equilibrium price of $40 and selling units greater than 500. Hence, 500 goods is not an efficient quantity of goods.
True. When you analyze the key elements of a country's economic perspective environment, it is best to apply a systems perspective. When you follow the systems perspective you should be taking all of the behaviors, attributes and actions of a system when it's in its environment. instead of individualizing people and things within, it's an overall evaluation of the system.
Answer:
option (C) $5 in the U.S. and 3 euros in Italy
Explanation:
Data provided in the question:
Nominal exchange rate, E = 0.80 euros per dollar
Real exchange rate = 
Now,
Real exchange rate = [ Price of good in US ] ÷ [ Price of Good in Italy ]
= 
Here,
PU = Price of US in dollars
PI = Price of Italy in Euros
Thus,
Real exchange in rate
= 
or
= 
hence,
we get
Ratio of Price of a good in US to Price of a Good in Italy =
or
we can say $5 in the U.S. and 3 euros in Italy
option (C) $5 in the U.S. and 3 euros in Italy
