1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
asambeis [7]
3 years ago
7

Explain why some countries chose to be nonaligned. What did they fear, and what did they have to gain by remaining neutral?

History
1 answer:
eduard3 years ago
4 0
With war, every country is afraid. They're afraid of possibly being ambushed, becoming in dept, and many other reasons. So by remaining neutral they can sit back and not have to worry about being attacked by any country that's fighting. But that's not always the case now and days. Hope I answered your question correctly.
You might be interested in
Explain 3 aspects of Scandinavian culture that led to Viking exploration and how these led to
OlgaM077 [116]

Answer:They were the first to pioneer trade routes down the Volga and the Dnepr; they opened the routes to Constantinople and the Byzantine Empire; they traded with the Franks and the Baltic; and they even opened up the routes to the far east.The exact reasons for Vikings venturing out from their homeland are uncertain; some have suggested it was due to overpopulation of their homeland, but the earliest Vikings were looking for riches, not land.The Vikings originated from the area that became modern-day Denmark, Sweden, and Norway. They settled in England, Ireland, Scotland, Wales, Iceland, Greenland, North America, and parts of the European mainland, among other places.

Explanation:

im sorry if this dont help you...

3 0
2 years ago
Based upon your outside knowledge, which of the following events would
ollegr [7]

Answer:D

Explanation: Socrates wanted to create an ethical system based on human reason rather than theological doctrine.

7 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
By the 1970s, what were some effects of the move to liberalism? Check all that apply. Both crime and poverty rates had greatly i
ss7ja [257]

The correct answer is:

- Both crime and poverty rates had greatly increased. With the reduction of social welfare programs advocated by the Neoliberal policies, budgets for the police and for government programs used to mitigate and remedy poverty were greatly decreased. This in turn meant that the police and the social programs had to do a lot more with a lot less resources which inevitable entailed a degradation of their services.

- Budget deficits in the federal government were rising. Indeed, one of the major tenets of neoliberalism is that taxation is a hindrance for the activities and prosperity of the private sector and the rich. This translated into tax cuts for the wealthiest that reduced the income of the federal government and that increased deficits.

- The federal government's role had become very limited. Neoliberals consider that big government is the problem. That is why they always de-fund it as much as they can and enact laws to keep the government from regulating all types of economic activities.

- Divorce rates and drug abuse were becoming major problems. Inevitably, as economic inequalities rise, the quality of life and access to economic and professional opportunities decreases and that puts quit a strain on households that have to cope with extreme unemployment and inflation but with stagnant wages/salaries. Inevitably, such social and economic instability takes a great toll on people and the fact that due to budget cuts to social security and lack of access to universal, comprehensive healthcare prevents them from getting medical/psychological assistance; they will resort to drug abuse in order to mitigate their physical/psychological ailments.  

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is a realistic scenario that poses both fallacious and valid arguments
xxTIMURxx [149]

Answer:

in philosophy, loguc seems to be prominently used as means to finding reason in someone's claim. this describes which statements are considered valid or fallacious. this being said, valid statement carry logic where as the other does not.

6 0
3 years ago
In japan during the Tokugawa shogunate, who ranked just below the shogun?
Alchen [17]

Answer:

Daimyo

Explanation:

During the Tokugawa Shogunate, the shogun was effectively the ruler of Japan. This gave shogun enormous power and authority. Just below the shogun, we find the daimyo. The daimyo was a feudal lord who owned large amounts of land. They were considered vassals of the shogun, and usually employed large armies of samurai to protect themselves and their property. Daimyo and shogun were extremely powerful until the early Meiji period.

7 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What does a flyby mission do?
    12·2 answers
  • 5. When the Articles of Confederation showed its weaknesses, the states decided to hold a Constitutional Convention to create a
    12·1 answer
  • Sullivan is suggesting that the United States A) will not be truly free without abolition. B) must have a social revolution to b
    8·2 answers
  • Who hoped in 1917 that Vladimir Lenin and the Bolsheviks would stir up dissent in Russia and possibly force the Russians to with
    11·1 answer
  • Position on the Columbian Exchange thesis
    10·1 answer
  • which paragraph in the section "the spread of the industrial revolution" suggests that early industrialization was not succesful
    9·1 answer
  • The colonists in the New World used enslaved African people as labor because
    9·1 answer
  • Which civilization would bind the feet of women do the women would appear more important?
    15·1 answer
  • Did Julius Caesar govern fairly? i really need help on this its a unit activity on plato
    12·2 answers
  • prior to 1863 when lincoln issued the emancipation proclamation, his central goal was not abolition, but what? leadership of the
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!