Answer:
Piercing the corporate veil
Explanation:
This are the options that come with this question:
- hiding behind the corporate skirt.
- whistleblowing.
- piercing the corporate veil.
- limited liability.
This is an example of the doctrine of "piercing the corporate veil." This describes a situation in which the shareholders of a corporation can be held personally liable for the debts and liabilities of a corporation, according to a court. This is in contrast to common practice in corporations, which assumes that, if a corporation is sued, the shareholders cannot be brought into the lawsuit. "Piercing the corporate veil" usually occurs in the case of fraud, or in the case of egregious and willful activity that put corporate gain over the public good.
The act of repairing for wrongdoings or for a mistake is called Atonement; in Judaism, Yom Kippur is the holiest day of the year in which <em>Atonement and contrition</em> are the main subjects
Jewish people use to spend the day fasting and praying.
Thereby the correct answer is: (C) Day of Atonement
Because, I don't think anybody wants to live in a community full of trash. (Littering) :)
Answer: यहाँ तपाईं यसलाई हेर्न जानुहोस्
Explanation:
Answer:
Yes, it would import wool
Explanation:
Autarka will import wool from the neighboring country because the country has a comparative advantage in the production of wool and hence wool from the country will be cheaper than what is obtainable in Autarka, Autarka should concentrate in the production of a good they have comparative advantage over the neighboring country in producing and export such good to the neighboring country and import wool.
