Answer: The War Hawks would influence the Republican party in their strong belief that the United States should spread democracy to other parts of the world. ...
Answer and Explanation:
Kant's principle of universalizability suggests that we do what we feel should be generalised or in his words universalised. I'm there words for something to be considered morally valid it should be generally satisfactory and not just apply to one person
On the other hand his principle of humanity suggests that we do those things that treat each human being as though he is the end not the means. In other words, we do not consider another human being to be something that could be used to achieve another thing but the sole purpose or end for which anything is done
The above do have contradictory applications since by generalizing a thing we could still be using a human being and not making him the end in this respect. I believe the best of the two principles however is the humanity principle since by holding this principle dear every human being would treat each other better and the universalizability principle would still apply.
A very basic answer could be ¨make an organized chart of data collected¨
<span>Freud believed that human behavior was motivated by unconscious conflicts that were almost always sexual or aggressive in nature.
According to Freud's theory, from childhood itself our behavior is unconsciously perpetuated by sexual attraction towards our of parent of the sex opposite to ours. This is known as the Oedipus Complex (in male children) and the Electra complex (in female children). These complexes are also characterized by unconscious conflicts that are aggressive in nature with parents of the same sex as ours.</span>
