1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Masja [62]
3 years ago
7

Government under the roman republic or government under the roman empire to be more successful an why

History
1 answer:
Nonamiya [84]3 years ago
6 0
He Roman Republic was what made Rome great. The Roman Empire was what brought about its decline and fall.

<span>When Rome became a Republic in 509BC, Rome's territory consisted of little more than the city itself. Rome was barely more than a collection of villages. By the time the Republic was effectively abolished by Octavian at the end of the 1st century BC, Rome had become a huge empire, as this map shows.</span>
You might be interested in
During the great awakening what led to the foundation of several colleges in the new England colonies
Zanzabum
Religious figures such as ministers who had different religious perspectives or ideas set up colleges around New England where they would be better able to preserve those ideas and be able to practice their specific religious thoughts and beliefs with other believers, as well as people who were interested and wanted to convert.

Hope it helps.
5 0
3 years ago
Speech about educated women empower the<br> nation ​
Bas_tet [7]
Let me say that too often adolescent girls face intersecting disadvantages because of their age, gender, ethnic background, sexual identity, religion affiliation, income, disability among other compounded factors. We have seen pictures, evoked images of girls in different situations that live with disadvantage, even without crisis. The perception and reality of vulnerability arising out of these multiple intersectionalities really creates that context of discrimination and differentiated impact of crisis.

During conflict or humanitarian situations, natural disasters or climate change, these factors exacerbate and disproportionately and differentially affect young women and girls due to neglect of their human rights and the intersecting forms gender-inequality and discrimination that they endure. So this is how we shine the light on this particular situation of girls in emergencies. As was mentioned, it is often forgotten that women and girls are not only helpless victims, they are sources of power, power to cope, power to prevent, power to reduce risk, power for resilience and transformation and to build back better after crisis. That is the power that we want to invoke and tap into.

We must be outraged about the disadvantages that girls still experience. But here has been some progress. Humanitarian actors and governments are much more aware today about addressing crises and resilience building with a gender lens and with a girls lens. But, we still have miles to go.

Imagine that to date, women and children account for more than 75 per cent of the refugees and displaced persons at risk from war, famine, persecution and natural disasters.
Every 10 minutes, somewhere in the world, an adolescent girl dies because of violence.
Up to one-third of adolescent girls report their first sexual experience as being forced and they are victims of sexual violence. Currently at least 133 million girls and women have experienced female genital mutilation.
6 0
3 years ago
To what does the term "Bedouin" refer?
solong [7]
The answer is groups of Arab nomads because “bedouin” refers to arabic speaking, nomadic people from middle eastern deserts (in North Africa, the Arabian Peninsula, Jordan, Egypt, Israel, Iraq, Syria)
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why was West Germany accepted into NATO in 1955?
Alexus [3.1K]
The entrance of West Germany into NATO was the final step in integrating that nation into the defense system of Western Europe. It was also the final nail in the coffin as far as any possibility of a reunited Germany in the near future. For the next 35 years, East and West Germany came to symbolize the animosities of the Cold War. In 1990, Germany was finally reunified; the new German state remained a member of NATO.
3 0
3 years ago
Compare the similarities and differences in the development of the Chesapeake and New England colonies, accounting for why the m
JulijaS [17]

Answer:

Below is my <u><em>entire</em></u> essay.

Explanation: The colonies, for the most part, were all in it together to benefit for the best of each others success. However, not all of the colonies could function the same. The New England colonies and Chesapeake colonies were both similar in the sense of their relationships with American Indians, however their economies, founding's, and overall factors of functioning are very different from each other.

   The New England colonies had much different land and climate than the Chesapeake colonies. New England had rocky, thin soil that was far from prime for agriculture to be a playing part in the economy. So, New England resorted to lumbering, trading and fishing to keep up and have an active part in the overall economy of the colonies. On the other hand, the Chesapeake colonies were solely based on trading and agriculture. They had relied heavily on the growth of tobacco as it was extremely popular, and their weather, soil and terrain was perfect for its production.

      These colonies were also founded on different beliefs. The New England colonies were dominantly puritan. A puritan was a member of a religious reform movement known as Puritanism that arose within the Church of England in the late 16th century. They wanted to get away from the Church of England and started based their reform of church in the New England colonies. Unlike solidly Puritan New England, the Chesapeake colonies presented an assortment of religions. The presence of Quakers, Mennonites, Lutherans, Dutch Calvinists, and Presbyterians made the dominance of one faith next to impossible. 

    These colonies were similar, however, in the fact that they originally wanted to be allies with the natives who were there before them. They traded with them and it seemed that everything was going smooth, but and the colonists kept encroaching on their territory so wars broke out like the French-American Indian war and Rebellions like Bacon's Rebellion.

Overall, the colonies shared the same objectives and wanted to succeed as a whole, but they had different approaches to their economic successes. 

   

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did roman conquest in Europe and the Mediterranean influence the culture of those regions
    15·2 answers
  • Why did the Founding Fathers compromise on using a federal system for the new government?
    11·2 answers
  • By getting involved in Vietnam the US was continuing what cold war policy?
    10·1 answer
  • Which did the british do during the buildup to the american revolution?
    7·1 answer
  • Senators serve a life-time term. true or false
    5·2 answers
  • Can you please answer PLEASE HELP and actually answer and answer each question please! please no trick answers and actually answ
    14·1 answer
  • If you were able to add or change the Constitution what would it be, and why?
    10·1 answer
  • Theresa wants to be more active in her local government. Which of the following is NOT a way Theresa can be more active in local
    13·2 answers
  • What was the main difference between the Senate and the<br> Assembly?
    5·1 answer
  • Roman copies of Greek statues were usually displayed
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!