Answer:
The answer is letter B, a six-year term means more time to draw criticism.
Explanation:
A senator is a member of the United States Senate. As part of the group, he has the ability to confirm presidential appointments and treaties, as well as the power to reject them. He also has the power to impeach the President or to put any government official to trial. He serves the people in his position for 6 years and within that term, he has some pros and cons.
Letter a is a privilege because serving the government for a term of 6 years is long time. This means that senator has more time to promote his agenda.
Letter b is a burden because being in the term for a long time will attract a lot of criticisms. It is common to receive criticisms when you're working in the government. Thus, this becomes a stressful situation for the one sitting in the position.
Letter c is a privilege because the senator has lots of opportunities when it comes to making and amending the laws.
Letter d is a privilege because senators have lots of staff under them. The size range is from 20 to 60 and that's quite number of people who're willing to help him.
Thus, this makes the answer as letter b, for it is the only burden among the options.
What plans? No one can help you if you do t give the whole question
Clergy abuse caused people to begin criticizing the Catholic Church.
The arrest of a criminal suspect.
If you've ever watched a television crime drama, you've heard the "Miranda warning" -- or at least the beginning of it: "You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law. You have the right to an attorney ...." There's a couple more sentences to the warning, but TV shows often cut to the next scene before hearing the arresting officer finish their recitation of the full warning.
Miranda v. Arizona was a Supreme Court case decided in 1966. Ernesto Miranda was accused of kidnapping and raping a woman. He confessed to the crime when interrogated by police, but attorneys argued that he did not fully understand his 6th Amendment rights. After the decision in Miranda v. Arizona, it has become standard procedure in all arrests that the arresting officers must clearly state the accused person's rights -- their "Miranda rights," as they have become known.
I think it is the last one if not then it is the first one
