Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:
In order to solve this problem we must start by graphing the given function and finding the differential area we will use to set our integral up. (See attached picture).
The formula we will use for this problem is the following:

where:


a=0

so the volume becomes:

This can be simplified to:

and the integral can be rewritten like this:

which is a standard integral so we solve it to:
![V=9\pi[tan y]\limits^\frac{\pi}{3}_0](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=V%3D9%5Cpi%5Btan%20y%5D%5Climits%5E%5Cfrac%7B%5Cpi%7D%7B3%7D_0)
so we get:
![V=9\pi[tan \frac{\pi}{3} - tan 0]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=V%3D9%5Cpi%5Btan%20%5Cfrac%7B%5Cpi%7D%7B3%7D%20-%20tan%200%5D)
which yields:
]
Answer:
The correct option is;
Simpson Paradox
Step-by-step explanation:
The phenomenon whereby particular trends are prevalent in small data portions but are not evident or an inverse trend is observe when the portions are joined together is known as Simpson's paradox.
Whereby the data for calculating the bating averages as found online are given as follows;
Season, Derek Jeter David Justice
1995, 12/48 = 0.250 104/411 ≈ 0.253
1996, 183/582 ≈ 0.314 45/140 ≈ 0.321
The overall hits to the overall bats ratio are;
, (183 + 12)/(582 + 48) ≈0.310 (104+45)/(411+140) = 0.27
Which shows that Derek Jeter's overall average was better than Justice's average
Answer:
When N is an even number, use the first equation in the matrix. When N is negative use the second equation.
Step-by-step explanation:
n = 6 | 6/2 = 3
n=5 | 3(5)+1 = 16
Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

