<span>120
The simple answer is that 5 items can be arranged 5! (5 factorial) different ways. But let's expand upon that brief answer. We have 5 jobs and 5 machines with which to perform those jobs. So let's look at the 1st machine. Any of 5 of the jobs may be assigned to it. Now we have 4 jobs left unassigned. So let's look at the 2nd machine. For that machine, any of the 4 remaining jobs may be assigned to it, leaving 3 unassigned jobs. We can continue in that fashion, assigning at random one the of 3 remaining jobs to the 3rd machine, one of the 2 remaining jobs to the 4th machine, and finally, the only unassigned job to the 5th machine. So there's 5 * 4 * 3 * 2 * 1 = 5! = 120 different ways to assign those 5 jobs to all 5 machines.</span>
Answer:
Debit Accounts Receivable for $104,700; and Credit Sales Revenue for $104,700.
Debit Cash for $85,400; and Credit Accounts Receivable for $85,400.
Explanation:
The (summary) journal entries to record the items noted will look as follows:
<u>Particulars Debit ($) Credit ($) </u>
Accounts Receivable 104,700
Sales Revenue 104,700
<u><em>(To record net sales (all on account) for the year.) </em></u>
Cash 85,400
Accounts Receivable 85,400
<u>(Collections on accounts receivable during the year.) </u>
Answer:
A decrease in the price of domestically produced industrial robots will be reflected in the GDP deflator but not in the consumer price index.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Although from the outset, CPI and GDP Deflator might measure something very similar, there are a couple of key contrasts. The first is that GDP Deflator incorporates just local merchandise and nothing that is imported. This is diverse because the CPI includes anything purchased by buyers, including remote merchandise.
The subsequent contrast is that the GDP Deflator is a proportion of the costs all things considered and benefits while the CPI is a proportion of just merchandise purchased by shoppers.
Answer:
(A) The equilibrium quantity will increase.
Explanation:
An increase in demand and supply of electric cars would shift the demand and supply curves to the right.
Equilibrium quantity would increase.
Price would not change.
I hope my answer helps you
<span>The most recent study was done on June 1, 2017, and all information is from that date. There are 673 US District court judgeships and four territorial ones. At the time of this study, there were 160 active circuit court judges and 19 vacant positions, while there were 570 district court judges and a whopping 103 vacant positions.
There are 59 female circuit court judges, 37%. Men, therefore, are in 63% of positions. Intesretingly, this number has actually improved, with only one woman serving in 1977.
Disregarding race, 75% of circuit court judges are white, 13% African American, 9% Hispanic, and only 3% Asian American. 12 courts have African American judges, nine have Hispanic, and five have Asian American. Overall, all three percentages have risen since 1977 (with some variability), but interestingly, Asian Americans have only recently begun to rise in presence., starting in about 2010.
Combining gender and race, white men make up 45.6% of all circuit court judges, while Asian American women only make up 0.6%. In all races, men overpower women in numbers by a large amount.
Looking at age, the average is 64.7 years old, with over 50% over 65 and only 2% under 45. The vast majority were appointed between 45 and 54, though many came slightly before or after.
It is worth noting that the first openly gay circuit court judge was Todd M. Hughes, appointed by Obama in 2013.
If we are considering race, Asian Americans are the lowest represented. If we are considering gender, women are less represented. Overall in race and gender, Asian American women are least represented. Looking at age, people under 40 are underrepresented. Overall, though, the least common demographic would be open members of the LGBT+ community.
As you can see, this is not a straightforward question! It is a hugely interesting topic and one I plan to explore further.</span>
