Answer:
C
Step-by-step explanation:
It is provable about 180 ways, some of them quite elegant. There was a book published in the 1940s listing what they then knew. Others have been added since and it shows up in the oddest places which you can search out.
That is interesting but it does not answer your question.
A: Nothing is defined. This statement is a truth, but unproved. A is not the answer.
B: No term requires defining unless you don't know what a hypotenuse is, but that is a separate problem.
D: a postulate is a statement that is true that cannot be proven nor does it need to be. There aren't that many around in math. Euclid said "All right angles are congruent." True and not needing proof.
C: It is a theorem. This is a statement that may not be obvious and does require proof.
Answer:
Yes, the test was conducted with a risk of a type I error.
Step-by-step explanation:
If we reject the null hypothesis, does this mean that we have proved it to be false beyond all doubt? Explain your answer.
Yes, for a null hypothesis to be rejected, it has being proven beyond all doubt that the null hypothesis will not work. the normal distribution has being used for the probability calculation.
if the null hypothesis is rejected and the alternative hypothesis is accepted, a type I error as occur.
In general terms:
‘a hypothesis has been rejected when it should have been accepted’. When this occurs, it is called a type I error.
Answer:
a5=445
Explanation:
a of n=(a+1)*n
a1=2
I found the pattern to add 1 to the previous number and then multiply it by its number in the sequence. Apologies for the terrible format of my recursive formula.
Proof of pattern:
(2+1)*2=6
(6+1)*3=21
(21+1)*4=88
a5=(88+1)*5=445
