There is no congruence between the triangles based on the given information. In general, two sides and an angle not between them are insufficient to specify the triangle completely. In this case, the angles that are congruent are adjacent to non-corresponding sides, so even if SSA correspondence were sufficient to ensure congruence, it would not be sufficient in this case.
The appropriate choice is
... none
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
The result is given by means of some algebraic handling:
- Multiplication of rationals.
- Dividing each term by 2.
- Dividing each term by 2.
- Dividing each term by 3.
Answer:
4. QT and RT are 2 sides of an equilateral triangle.
5. Congruent by SAS
Step-by-step explanation:
All sides of an equilateral triangle are equal in length.
Let
x--------> the border’s length
y--------> the border’s width
P--------> perimeter of the border
we know that
x=5+y------> equation 1
P=2*[x+y]-----> P=2x+2y
P <=180 ft
(2x+2y) <= 180-------> equation 2
substitute the equation 1 in equation 2
2*[5+y]+2y <= 180
10+2y+2y <= 180
4y <= 180-10
4y <=170
y <=42.5 ft
so
the maximum value of the width is 42.5 ft
for y=42.5 ft
x=42.5+5------> x=47.5 ft
the answer is
the width of the border is less than or equal to 42.5 ft
