Question

Suppose a moral theory is inconsistent with two of your most trustworthy and important moral judgments (and other considerations do not counterbalance this fact). You should then regard the theory as a. definitely false. b. imperfect but true. c. true until proven otherwise. d. dubious and possibly false.

Answer 1

Answer:

Option D is correct

Explanation:

There is no well substantiated explanation of the theory which has been confirmed by series of standard experiment and observation.

Answer 2

Answer:

d. dubious and possibly false.

Explanation:

If a moral theory contradicts the theories of two of most reliable sources, it means that there is something wrong with the theory or there is a falsification of facts in the theory. It is better to rely on the theories of the sources that are most trustworthy and reliable than on a moral theory without a substantial basis or principles.