Answer:
According to Eric Hobsbawm, a British Marxist historian, this first stage of the 19th century is considered the Age of Revolutions precisely because of the spread of ideals of freedom by organized groups in Europe. They defended themes such as human rights, equality between citizens and the sovereignty of the population. Influenced by the French Revolution, nationalist and liberal activists aggravated the permanent revolution. At that time, important movements were taking place, such as wars for the national independence of the colonies in America, among other upheavals.
The American Civil War was an armed conflict that ran from 1861 to 1865 in the United States of America. In this conflict, American citizens were polarized on two fronts, that of the Union, which brought together the northern states of the country, and that of the Confederate States, which brought together southern states. This war, which resulted in more than 600,000 deaths, was the bloodiest in the history of the United States and the American continent.
Answer:
Explanation:In historiography, the term historical revisionism identifies the re-interpretation of an historical account.[1] It usually involves challenging the orthodox (established, accepted or traditional) views held by professional scholars about a historical event or time-span or phenomenon, introducing contrary evidence, or reinterpreting the motivations and decisions of the people involved. The revision of the historical record can reflect new discoveries of fact, evidence, and interpretation, which then results in revised history. In dramatic cases, revisionism involves a reversal of older moral judgments.
At a basic level, legitimate historical revisionism is a common and not especially controversial process of developing and refining the writing of histories. Much more controversial is the reversal of moral findings, whereby what mainstream historians had considered (for example) positive forces are depicted as negative. Such revisionism, if challenged (especially in heated terms) by the supporters of the previous view, can become an illegitimate form of historical revisionism known as historical negationism if it involves inappropriate methods such as:
the use of forged documents or implausible distrust of genuine documents
attributing false conclusions to books and sources
manipulating statistical data
deliberately mis-translating texts
This type of historical revisionism can present a re-interpretation of the moral meaning of the historical record.[2] Negationists use the term "revisionism" to portray their efforts as legitimate historical revisionism. This is especially the case when "revisionism" relates to Holocaust denial.
Tim Keller on Dr. King’s rejection of relativism:
When Martin Luther King Jr. confronted racism in the white church in the South, he did not call on Southern churches to become more secular. Read his sermons and “Letter from the Birmingham Jail” and see how he argued. He invoked God’s moral law and the Scripture. He called white Christians to be more true to their own beliefs and to realize what the Bible really teaches. He did not say, “Truth is relative and everyone is free to determine what is right or wrong for them.” If everything is relative, there would have been no incentive for white people in the south to give up their power. Rather, Dr. King invoked the prophet Amos, who said, “Let justice roll down like waters, and righteousness as a mighty stream.” The greatest champion of justice in our era knew the antidote to racism was not less Christianity, but a deeper and truer Christianity.
(Reason for God, pp.64-65)
Answer:
Both inventions were done by teenagers at their times.
Both inventions claimed to help the environment Boyan slat's machine would clean up trash flouting in ocean. Duro - Aind adebola, Akindele Abiola, faleka oluwatoyin and Bello Eniola proposed power generation from urine that would not create carbon monoxide.
unfortunately, both inventions were also challenged by more established scientists and engineers.
