Answer: It describes why the colonists wanted to be free from Britain and what led to their decision to fight against British rule.
Explanation:
The Declaration of Independence refers to the pronouncement that was adopted by the Second Continental Congress in 1776 during their meeting in Pennsylvania.
The document stated that the thirteen colonies were now sovereign and has become independent states and therefore the British rule isn't recognized anymore and now referred to as the United States.
The main ideas of the Declaration of Independence include the fact that all men are equal by God and that everyone has some rights which the government should protect and if any government wants to withhold such rights, the people can then revolt.
The historical significance of the Declaration of Independence was that it describes why the colonists wanted to be free from Britain and what led to their decision to fight against British rule.
Answer:
Statement that best explains the difference in viewpoint in the Greenberg interview from that in the informational text on Thurgood Marshall is Option D: The Greenberg interview provides an insider's view of the Brown vs. Board of Education case; the perspective of the informational article is more distant.
Explanation:
Brown v. Board of Education case was a decision which set benchmark in Supreme Court of U.S. It ruled that the state laws which establish racial discrimination in public schools are unconstitutional.
Thurgood Marshall was an American lawyer in the Supreme Court of the United States. Other given option are incorrect. Greenberg gave personal knowledge of Thurgood Marshall and about the case but the informational article was only based on research.
Greenberg interview gave important details while article was based only on research.
the answer is action lines
Answer:
Hello,
When you have multiple that are all working together on a project or in conjunction on that same project, This would we be a great to implement CDM.
Explanation:
Its easy for one person to make a speedy decision on behalf of the entire team or group. This would only be acceptable if time was constricted or it did not really require a group as they would not be affected .
One of the great take always from CDM is that we are all different and have our own unique way of looking at how to solve problems. When we share a problem with a group then it becomes a much better well thought-out plan. This is more likely to be successful everyone involved as everyone was heard and ideas were spoken.
Example sentence: because he had witnessed the murder, the man received an injunction to testify in court.
