Jobs
Money
Healthcare
Family
Answer:
the answer would be B,D,A
Explanation:
hope this helps
Answer:
Henry Clay
Explanation:
The Election of 1824 saw no clear cut winner. Under the terms of the 12th Amendment, the House of Representatives would select the president from the candidates with the three highest totals. This eliminated Henry Clay. Jackson's supporters were confindent of winning. When John Quincy Adams was elected by the vote in the House, Jackson's followers claimed a deal must have been made. When Henry Clay was appointed Adam's Secretary of State, Jackson's supporters claimed a corrupt bargain had been made between Adams and Clay, in which Clay would become Secretary of State if he used his influence in the House to get votes for Adams. There was never any concret proof of this deal. Actually, Clay made his decision to support Adams before the vote because they held basically the same ideas for the nation and both disliked the ideas of Jackson. And, Clay turned out to be an outstanding Secretary of State.
Answer:
my brother has autism i don't help him alot he's pretty smart
Answer:
Counterbalancing
Explanation:
Order effects is known to be the area of order of treatments in the course of an experiment process. Simply put it this way, putting the treatments in a separate order will cause some changes to the results depending on the order of administration of the treatment just as in the case study.
Order effects could be due to probably anything such as fatigue (from one or two tests), practice (familiar with the testing environment boost performance) or varying Testing Conditions (from the testing environment such as heating, lighting, or ergonomics).
Counterbalancing, comes into play in times of all probable treatments being given in all probable orders can regulate for order effects.
Counterbalancing is a procedure used to solve order effects when employing a repetitive process design. With counterbalancing, the participant sample in our case study is grouped in fours using a within-subjects design with four levels to his independent variable. Conner has ¼ of the participants complete each level in ABCD order, a ¼ of participants in BCDA order, a ¼ of participants in CDAB order, and a ¼ of participants in DABC order.
The varying order effects would be compensated for by this procedure.
For within-subjects design, two major counterbalancing techniques would be used involving subject-by-subject counterbalancing, which regulates progressive error for every subject, and across-subjects counterbalancing that evenly spread progressive error over all subjects.
