This question is incomplete. Here's the complete question.
Read Father’s Help
By: R. K Narayan
if you were swami , what would you have done? would you have told the truth to your father,given the letter to the headmaster or tried to provoke samuel as swami did?
Answer:
Swami only described Samuel as a violent teacher toward his students to get out of going to school. Considering that he lied, despite his le having some truth behind it, the right thing to do would have been being honest about not wanting to go to school, and probably accepting that he would have to go anyway.
Explanation:
However, telling the truth to his father should also include letting him know about Samuel´s bad behavior. Despite maybe not being as bad as Swami said, no violence, to any degree, should be accepted in school, or anywhere to that matter. And considering the father´s actions in the story, we can assume he would have done something about it when the headmaster return.
Answer:
The concept of critical thinking that this is most problematic for is latent
Explanation:
From the different options given about critical thinking the one that fits better to the analysis is the latent content when people keep traumas or inner psychological conflicts they sometimes get reflected in dreams in an abstract form which is the case of Teu, this dream can be showing fears of secrets.
I think the author uses a tone that is calm at times and frenzied depending on where in the story you mean.
btw u mean tone ;)
Answer:
pathos
Explanation:
The rhetorical technique used here is is pathos.
Pathos is a rhetorical technique which appeals to the emotions of the audience. It is actually used to invoke feelings of the audience.
We see that in the statement, the speaker said "I do not think, comrades, that I shall be with you for many months longer, before I die,..." Such statement will invoke the emotions of the audience. The speaker's statement about his death actually arouses a feeling of pity and sorrow in the audience.
