<span>The options attached to the question above are given below:</span>
<span>A. </span>The culture of the host country is likely to be
much more individualistic than U.S. culture is.
B. The manager will have greater difficulty finding
educated workers in the host country than in the United States.
C. The manager may not be familiar with the host country’s
language.
D. The host country will likely tax a larger
percentage of the manager’s income than the United States would.
E. The host country will likely have few
protections for its workers.
ANSWER
The correct option is D.
A socialist system is a type of economic system in which the factors of production are jointly owned by all the citizens and production affair is regulated by the government. Such a country does not encourage individuals to operate personal business. Thus, such a country will lay high tax on the income of the manager in order to discourage him from selling his machine in their country.
Answer:
I believe it it the second option.
Explanation:
If she is making $3,000 for the whole summer and her rate is $1,000, than the monthly income is $1,000.
Answer:
Joint venture
Explanation:
A joint venture is an agreement between two or more parties mostly businesses so as to share markets, intellectual property, assets, knowledge, capital, profits as well as losses. A common phenomenon in which joint venture is used is the partnering up with a local business to enter a foreign market. For example is a company that wants to expand its operations to new countries, can enter into a joint venture agreement with a local business in the new country, thus benefiting from an already existing distribution network
For Axiom International, an Australian company that wants to expand its operations to China, a country that is politically, culturally, and economically different, the mode of entry should be a joint venture with a country in china.
Answer:
$90,000
Explanation:
Calculation to determine what Jamie’s at-risk limitation on losses is:
Using this formula
Risk limitation on losses=[Partnership M +(General partnership interest× Recourse debt agreement)]
Let plug in the formula
Risk limitation on losses= [$40,000 + (50% × $100,000)]
Risk limitation on losses=($40,000+$50,000)
Risk limitation on losses=$90,000
Therefore Jamie’s at-risk limitation on losses is:$90,000 and the reason why Jamie’s at-risk limitation on losses was the amount of $90,000 was because of his share of the recourse debt of the amount of $100,000 as well as the cash amount of $40,000 he invested.
