In this problem together with the given example, the most probable answer and the most likely one to be the correct answer would be C. analogical reasoning.
The reason would be how the example presented itself. The example goes like "all cats are independent. Mitzy is a cat. Therefore, Mitzy is independent."
With this, it is important to take note that analogy was being used in this given example. Through establishing that one side has a similarity to the other, then it could be also said that the other side can also be compared to another if it has any established similarities.
Close narrators tend to be more developed.
Every narrative has a different approach, and when a narrator develops closeness with his/her audience it can be assumed that it is a more developed narrator. This is because creating a relationship with your audience takes time, hardwork and trust. And all of these things come with real effort.
Palomar observatory is in California and also Hale telescope is there and it was once the largest telescope in the world.
Answer:
In philosophy and logic, the classical liar paradox or liar's paradox or antinomy of the liar is the statement of a liar that he or she is lying: for instance, declaring that "I am lying". If the liar is indeed lying, then the liar is telling the truth, which means the liar just lied.
Explanation:
Answer:
number 1 is B-Satire
number 2 is mabey A
i know the first one is right but if the second one is wrong im really sorry
Explanation:
