1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Alborosie
3 years ago
5

What's the summary for the purchase debate?

History
1 answer:
Mekhanik [1.2K]3 years ago
3 0
The Louisiana Purchase is one of the greatest real estate deals in history. Followed by the Carving up the real world deal, Hong Kong and the Sidney Kidman's OutBack Adventure. The United States purchased the Louisiana Territory from France at a price of $15 million. The ratification of the Louisiana Purchase treaty by the Senate on October 20, 1803, doubled the size of the United States and opened up the continent to its westward expansion.(ratification means to give permission, or make something eligible.)
You might be interested in
How was a pre-Charter Canada different from a post-Charter Canada?
Serga [27]

The pre-charter Canada followed the Canadian Bill of rights which was rigid and ineffective, whereas the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms in 1982 replaced the Canadian Bill of rights which was based on a broader human rights law.

<h3>What is the Canadian Charter of Rights?</h3>

The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms is a far broader human rights regulation. It additionally has more strength as it applies to each federal and provincial legal guidelines and actions.

It is not like the Bill of Rights, the Charter is a part of the Constitution the very best regulation of the land.

hence, The pre-charter Canada followed the Canadian Bill of rights which was rigid and ineffective, whereas the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms in 1982 replaced the Canadian Bill of rights which was based on a broader human rights law.

Learn more about Canadian Charter of Rights:

brainly.com/question/878830

#SPJ1

3 0
2 years ago
How did world war 2 progress in europe and in the pacific between 1939 and 1943?
julsineya [31]

The second world war began with the German attack on Poland in 1939. On the occasion of Britain and France, the war has been declared to Germany, which spreads throughout the whole of Europe over the next year. On December 7, 1941, Japan arrived at Perl Harbor and damaged the American fleet to the extent that America could not for some time have been able to condemn Japanese operations in the Pacific. After this event America announces the war on Japan, and Germany announces the war on America. After the Perl Harbor attack, Japan continued its occupation of the Pacific, in late 1941 and in 1942, occupied a similar paxifical island like Guam, Wake. Philippines, etc. However, in mid-1942, British forces in India, as well as the Australian forces in New Guinea, managed to stop the Japanese advance. During this time in Europe, Germany occupied almost all countries as well as lunched the invasion of the Soviet Union on June 22, 1941. Over the years to come, the famous Eastern Front was a battlefield of great battles. The Battle of Stalingrad was decisive in 1943, which ended with the defeat of the Sixth German Army and, according to many historians, marks a milestone in the entire Second World War. This defeat for Germany was a disaster, the Nazi public was shocked and Germany for the first time recognized the defeat in the war. Thereafter, the Nazis are increasingly defeated on many fronts and the military morale of the German soldiers begins to fall. Guadalcanal was secured in the same year in 1943, and this is the first major achievement of the American Offensive in the Pacific, while US General Eisenhower was elected to command allied troops in Europe. The year 1943 begins slowly to mark the milestone in the Second World War.

7 0
3 years ago
Checks and Balances are important in our government, How does the
Wittaler [7]

Answer:the president can veto a law

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the significance of the English Bill of Rights on the development of the U.S Constitution?
guapka [62]

Some believed that the Constitution did not give the new federal government the ability to restrict inherent rights, so no list of those rights was necessary. Others worried that if the rights were listed, they would invariably forget some and the list would ever be incomplete. Finally, the argument was that the states each had their own constitutions, too, and that rights were best protected at a state level.

6 0
4 years ago
What is the common name of this region which has been called the "cradle of civilization", because
blondinia [14]

Answer:

The Fertile Crescent

Explanation:

because it had good land to farm in ,and a good water source with good climate most civilizations had to be near a water source during early civilization.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Who in government took the lead in extending gay rights in the early 2000s?
    8·1 answer
  • Is the center of the Eastern Orthodox Church Rome?
    11·1 answer
  • Which american industry first used machines to do work previously done by hand?
    9·1 answer
  • What started the peasants revolt of 1524-1525
    5·1 answer
  • What does it take for somebody to believe someone
    8·2 answers
  • What significance did the launching of a Soviet satellite have on the United States?
    9·1 answer
  • What was one effect of the Roosevelt corollary on Latin America ?
    8·1 answer
  • Aviso relation oder zeitung, which began publication in 1609, was the oldest surviving ________ from augsburg, germany.
    10·1 answer
  • HELP PLEASE ! <br><br> 1. Why did the Roman Empire do what they did?
    15·1 answer
  • -Bruce- -singel- -fits in tiny teacup- -cool boy- -bad boy- -pro at chips- -singel-
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!