The so-called behaviorist revolution transformed the practice of research into political science in the 1960s. Methodological advances since then have enabled great advances in the field of comparative studies and have surpassed the limits of industrially developed nations, which has enabled the accumulation of information on values, political attitudes and behaviors of publics from nations on all continents
The first one involves questions about individuals' political attitudes and values, brought together under the traditional label of “political culture”. Studies on formation and change in attitudes, subjective political effectiveness, adherence to democracy, political tolerance, interpersonal trust and in political institutions, among others, have been conducted by a significant number of researchers in recent decades.
A second axis concerns electoral behavior, in particular the study of the decision-making process and the conditions for voting. This pioneering area dates back to the 1940s and still occupies a central place today in studies on political behavior. In the gravitational axis of studies on electoral behavior, a number of auxiliary areas for the study of political behavior were developed, such as political communication and the effects of electoral campaigns.
Finally, we have studies on political participation that go beyond electoral limits, with emphasis on the types of contestation that have been gaining more and more space on the research agenda due to their strong presence and political relevance, today, in democracies. It is important to highlight that the behaviorist view of these phenomena is quite different from that adopted by researchers from social movements and other collective actors, since the focus of the analysis here is the individual.
History is defined as a time of historical, written documents, so they would have some very limited amount of inscriptions, sometimes one line long, that they can use.
They would use those and complement this information with archaeological information from the time.
<span>George Orwell’s novel of 1984 uses language as medium similar to a weapon. He believes that words are powerful and that it can be used to conceal the truth and mislead the people easily. He uses words to backlash this corruption, into a language of peace and unity in politics and in the people.</span>
Answer:
The answer is William Tecumseh Sherman Hope this Helps!
Answer:
vertical mobility
Explanation:
Vertical mobility -
It refers to the movement of a person or the group up or down the hierarchy status .
It is also known as social mobility .
Vertical movement is the movement up or down the hierarchy , which may or may not be related to the status of the society .
Hence ,
from the question information , this type of social mobility is called vertical mobility .