How did composers change the way they composed from the Classical era to the Romantic era?

1 answer:

5 0

One of the main ways in which composers changed the way they composed from the Classical era to the Romantic era was that they took more risks and "broke the rules" when it came to structure and melodic movement.

You might be interested in

What was the significance of the sinking of the Lusitania?

Marina86 [1]

Answer:

It was the incident which expedited U.S. involvement in World

Explanation:

I believe the correct answer to this question is option "A" Because The sinking of the Cunard ocean liner RMS Lusitania occurred on Friday, 7 May 1915 during the First World War, as Germany waged submarine warfare against the United Kingdom which had implemented a naval blockade of Germany. War I.

5 0

3 years ago

Which state demanded that the new constitution include a bill of rights?

Vika [28.1K]

That would be Pennsylvania

7 0

3 years ago

How did the Aztecs use tributes collected from surrounding tribes?

dem82 [27]

b. They were used to pay the Spanish.

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Excavations of the Roman city of Sepphoris have uncovered numerous detailed mosaics depicting several readily identifiable anima

klasskru [66]

Answer:

A. Stones are irrelevant for this conclusion,

B. This answer doesn't address how knowledge of species only got to Sepphoris from travelling artisans

C Interesting answer choice, but it could support traveling artisan conclusion or a common knowledge base of species across all of Rome.

D. This runs counter to the conclusion- If the species are known then any artisan (not necessarily a traveling artisan ) could have created the mosaics.

E. This option states that there isn't a common knowledge base of species which supports the conclusion that only traveling artisans cold have created the mosaics.

8 0

4 years ago

which of the following describes a reason historians might want to use a primary source to study an event a) it does not need to

Setler79 [48]

The correct answer is C. It described the event as it was experienced at the time

Explanation:

A primary source is any source including documents, paintings, manuscripts, diaries or recordings that are created at the moment the event occurs. On the other hand, a secondary source is a document that is usually created to report, summarize, analyze a primary source. In comparison to secondary sources, primary sources are created when the even occurs and are closer to it, but usually more subjective. In the case of historians wanting to study an event a primary source has multiple advantages, one of this is that the document would reflect the way the event was experienced as the source is created at the same time the event occurs or short after this, and reported by someone who was part of the event, experience it or witness it in a closer way which provides a closer perspective of the event.

6 0

3 years ago