Please be more specific I don’t quite understand the question
The answer that best completes the statement above is POSITIVE REINFORCEMENT IN OPERANT CONDITIONING. From the term itself operant conditioning, this is when behavior is being controlled or influenced by a certain consequence. Operant conditioning can be of different types such as positive reinforcement, negative reinforcement, positive punishment, and negative punishment. In Jennifer's case, this can be classified as positive reinforcement since the stimulus being used encourages her to do the same action again in the future.
<u>Answer:
</u>
In this case, Mr. Glasscock is the plaintiff.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- The suit brought against Mr. Steve Beckham is to make him refund the payment that Jane had made him for the delivery of roses required for the party.
- In this case, Mr. Glasscock in the one who has brought the case of the breach of contract to the court of law. Hence, Mr. Glasscock can be deemed to be the plaintiff in this matter.
Answer:
Brahmins
Explanation:
At the top of the hierarchy were the Brahmins who were mainly teachers and intellectuals and are believed to have come from Brahma's head. Then came the Kshatriyas, or the warriors and rulers, supposedly from his arms.
Hi can you please answer my new question
