1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Elis [28]
3 years ago
13

The physical presence of an out-of-state party in a particular state is generally an automatic basis for jurisdiction over the d

efendant by both that state's courts and the federal trial court within that state.
True or False
Law
1 answer:
finlep [7]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

<h3>The answer is true.</h3>

Explanation:

In the US, the states have jurisdiction over any crime which may take place within a state's jurisdiction and territory. Both the state court as well as the federal trial court of a particular state may issue a warrant to a non-domicile/out of a state party to appear before the court.

For instance, if an person from Nevada attends a concert in Colorado and gets into a brawl while still in Nevada, he/she will be convicted of assault and battery in Nevada court itself.

In such cases, the defendants may hire an attorney from that particular state to represent him in the court.

You might be interested in
A state’s lieutenant governor is similar to which position at the federal level?
Sunny_sXe [5.5K]

Answer:

vice president

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Where does the best law student come from?
slega [8]

Answer:

University of Notre Dame Law School in Indiana, is now an associate justice on the Supreme Court.

Explanation:

i think

3 0
3 years ago
How is the modern Department of Defense different from the old Department of War?
Ede4ka [16]

Answer:

t is a cabinet department and not an independent executive agency.

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
The type of Congress established in Article 1, Section 1 of the US Constitution, is
yulyashka [42]
Bicameral because of the two houses currently in congress
6 0
3 years ago
Tori and scott have applied for an $8,000 installment loan to pay for a new car. they are told that the loan is approved and the
ioda

Answer:

Your answer would be B; "they signed the contract with the first dealer and now  must take the original deal."

Explanation:

They already signed the contract with the first dealer and now the only option available to them is to take the original deal since they have already signed the contract meaning they have legal duty to that first dealer. (Legal Duty: a legally binding obligation on a contract to follow the law when doing something towards the other part. Since they have signed it is legally binding that they now take the original deal or the first deal.)

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • True or false: Qualifying a lead involves confirming that the lead actually has a recognized need for the offering and the abili
    15·1 answer
  • Which style of communication should officers maintain?
    7·1 answer
  • Match the vocab with the right definition. SOMEONE PLEASE HELP!!!!!!!!
    12·1 answer
  • Why should you read the Bible?
    6·1 answer
  • What are ultimate laws?
    11·1 answer
  • ¿Qué dependencia de gobierno se encarga de cobrar las contribuciones del artículo 2 del código fiscal de la federación en México
    8·1 answer
  • Explain the statute of general application​
    11·2 answers
  • Which branch of government is responsible for enforcing laws?
    8·1 answer
  • What is the name of the report of a grand jury investigation, which usually includes a recommendation of indictment
    12·1 answer
  • IM ACTUALLY BEGGIN PLEASE HELP ME ITS DUE SOON&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;Evaluate the responsiveness of the
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!