1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Elis [28]
3 years ago
13

The physical presence of an out-of-state party in a particular state is generally an automatic basis for jurisdiction over the d

efendant by both that state's courts and the federal trial court within that state.
True or False
Law
1 answer:
finlep [7]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

<h3>The answer is true.</h3>

Explanation:

In the US, the states have jurisdiction over any crime which may take place within a state's jurisdiction and territory. Both the state court as well as the federal trial court of a particular state may issue a warrant to a non-domicile/out of a state party to appear before the court.

For instance, if an person from Nevada attends a concert in Colorado and gets into a brawl while still in Nevada, he/she will be convicted of assault and battery in Nevada court itself.

In such cases, the defendants may hire an attorney from that particular state to represent him in the court.

You might be interested in
what law enables citizens to obtain information from the government about a subject of interest when a written request is made?
Angelina_Jolie [31]

Answer:

FOIA

Explanation:

Since 1967, the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) has provided the public the right to request access to records from any federal agency. It is often described as the law that keeps citizens in the know about their government.

3 0
2 years ago
Summarize Arizona v Evans
Strike441 [17]

Answer:

United States Supreme Court case in which the Court instituted an exclusionary rule exception allowing evidence obtained through a warrant less search to be valid when a police record erroneously indicates the existence of an outstanding warrant due to negligent conduct of a Clerk of Court.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Judicial review of credentialing decisions is when the courts recognize that the procedure of credentialing hearing may be infor
Sati [7]

Answer:

True

Explanation:

Medical credentialing is the one procedure that allows patients to confidently place their trust in their chosen healthcare providers.

The patient in full trust on the service provider to keep his health records confidential without disclosing it to anyone without his due knowledge.

Patients are made aware of their health care experience and professional merits as this is the case with medical credentialing.

The court fully knows it is informal in credentialing hearing and in accessing such sensitive information the patient must be aware and unless it is the only means of Justice.

5 0
3 years ago
The federal court system is divided into two different courts. Who establishes these courts?
Julli [10]

Answer:

The two federal court systems in the United States are Supreme Court and the district level federal courts. The authority for the establishment of the Supreme Court was created in US constitution under Article III which called for a US Supreme Court and allowed for the US Congress to establish lower district federal courts. George Washington signed the Judiciary Act of 1789 to officially create the federal court system.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
PLEASE HELP!!
Semenov [28]

Answer:

A method of social control that encourages a person to adhere to established rules, laws, and societal norms is called a Spontaneous social control. This type of social control is practiced by rules, ideas, regulations, norms, and values, etc.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What are the rights and responsibilities of individuals in a democracy
    7·1 answer
  • Some Police Officer have issues with ethics and entitlement when they are doing the wrong thing.
    11·1 answer
  • That's the least I can do after letting the patron leave the bar so drunk last night. The statement that the patron was drunk wh
    10·1 answer
  • Beth is a victim of Carl’s violation of a criminal law. Criminal law is concerned with
    13·2 answers
  • Law is a practical discipline
    10·1 answer
  • Thankssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss
    10·2 answers
  • What were the 6 GOALS of the Constitution?
    12·1 answer
  • Which statement best evaluates the merits of the judges role in probation
    5·1 answer
  • The parental rights in education bill was signed into law in which state?.
    14·1 answer
  • What is a main difference between trial courts and appellate courts ?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!