1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Arada [10]
3 years ago
8

Using the event of the Columbine Shootings of 1997: You must state what actions the local government, state government, and fede

ral government (if available) took in response to the incident. a) How did these governments work together? b) What type of power conflicts were involved between the different forms of governments? (If none available, then state what could have been a realistic problem between the governments?) c) What steps do you think should have happened by both the state and federal government? Explain why you would have taken these steps.
Law
1 answer:
Ivanshal [37]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Explanation:

A)Working Together • Federal, state, and local governments work together to build roads. City governments cooperate on common interests. Serving the Public • Federal government gives grants-in-aid and block grants to state and local governments. State and local governments assure citizens' quality of life.

PLEASE MARK ME AS BRAINLIEST

You might be interested in
Josh and Suzie are teen parents. They can choose to bear all the financial and legal burdens of having a child. What legal provi
NeTakaya
1st Blank: Extend
2nd Blank: Can
5 0
3 years ago
Phil joins Sky-High Designs as a designer. He signs an employment agreement that says he will not engage in design work in the c
Crank

Answer:  

lose because employee contracts that restrict trade are illegal        

Explanation:

The above case relates to the restraint of trade. Export limitations are a concept in customary law referring to the constitutionality in commercial limits on the right to do commerce. This is a forerunner to the current rule to competition.

A statutory commitment not to exchange is null and unenforceable towards the Promiser as opposed to the national policy of encouraging commerce, although the restriction of exchange is fair to preserve the rights of a trade buyer. Trade restrictions may also manifest as binding covenants in work arrangements throughout post-termination.

3 0
3 years ago
Why violence? Why do terrorists do that? Which of the following is not one of the
Amanda [17]
A & C, terrorists have political goals and thrive to impact the public. They don’t harm others just to hurt them without any reason.
6 0
3 years ago
Need help with my test
gayaneshka [121]
Answer:

Option B)
As per me I would say it’s both at federal and state level
6 0
3 years ago
What are two reasons the Supreme Court focuses on private conferences
nika2105 [10]
Answer: As the final arbiter of the law, the Court is charged with ensuring the American people the promise of equal justice under law
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The
    6·2 answers
  • Macho went on the land of Bowleg uninvited. Macho has filed a trespass action claiming damages of $100. After listening to the s
    14·1 answer
  • Can I cop pull me over for looking too young too drive?
    7·2 answers
  • A person commits an offense if the person drives a vehicle in willful or wanton disregard for the safety of persons or property.
    8·1 answer
  • What would happen if you fake a credit card number online on a website.
    8·2 answers
  • 10 points
    9·2 answers
  • A lawyer is suing a structural engineer on behalf of a client for $250,000 who’s garage slid off a hillside because of the struc
    7·1 answer
  • Why did my dad hasn't come back with the milk?
    10·2 answers
  • What is the difference between Supremacy constitution in rule of law​
    15·1 answer
  • Indicators are definite signs that abuse or neglect has taken place
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!