<span>The correct answeri s A. Election reform. Critics of the system claimed that the senators behaved like property for lobbyists and that it wasn't about their competence but about what they could do for those who financed them. That's why they added the 17th amendment to enable popular sovereignty when it came to choosing senators.</span>
Answer:
All of the above
Explanation:
You use framing to do all of these things
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached we can say the following.
examples of positive and negative effects of the military regime
The positives are that a military regime is so discipline and strict enough to make people focus and work under heavy scrutiny and supervision to accomplish goals. Many times this is the only path to start to do more and better things, with discipline, perseverance, and order. That is exactly why strict disciplined, without flexibility, is referred to as military discipline. Let's have in mind that soldiers have no room for flexibility, thinking, or feedback. Soldiers simply follow orders and directions.
For instance, General Douglass McArthur's military regime after World War in Japan, trying to help Japan to reconstruct after the two atomic bomb explosions. His military planning goals, plus the focused discipline of the Japanese, made Japan a modern superpower in just a few years.
On the other hand, the negatives. People are no soldiers and like to enjoy their liberties. Under a military regime, there are no liberties. The military is in full command. Many times, under this type of regime, liberties are suppressed or controlled. THis is the opposite of a democracy.
We can see many examples of military regimes in the Middle East and Africa. People have no liberties and many times tyrannic military dictators oppress the citizens.
∵∴∵answer∵∴∵
B. The pace and intensity of international contacts accelerated as a result of transportation and communication breakthroughs
∵∴∵description∵∴∵
you dint include answers so I looked the question up
The British historian Paul Johnson, in his remarkable book Modern Times, attributed the twentieth century's huge death toll to the immense growth of organized state power, the decline of traditional religion, and the rise of totalitarian ideologies and gangster-statesmen.
/.) (.\
/)\| |/(\
//)/ hope this helps -Tom \(\\
/'"^" "^"`\
I would like brainliest if I deserve it plz
Answer:
It had the power to influence European kings.
Explanation:
European kings were, at that time, all highly catholic and, due to this, did not want to risk upsetting the Catholic Church because, not only could other countries rally with the Church and invade, but they feared that they would be going against God.