1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
anastassius [24]
3 years ago
12

What weather factor is consistently connected to crime in studies

Law
1 answer:
soldier1979 [14.2K]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

I think It's temperature

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Which of the following protects the interests and legal rights of both parties involved in an agreement?
Amanda [17]

Answer:

  • It would be a Contract.
  • This is a legally binding agreement which protects both parties from any negligence and malpractice when performing business related issues.
4 0
3 years ago
Are petitioners liable for the loss of the pawned jewelry ? why or why not?
CaHeK987 [17]

Answer:

No. Unless they do not peacefully stand with what the petition.

Explanation:

Taking the BLM petiton for example, the petition was made for peace and equality, and that's what the owner of the petition intended.

There were people who took advantage of this protest and turned it into a way for burgulary and started stealing under the circumstances that there was a peaceful protest.

7 0
2 years ago
elabora en papel pergamino virtual una propuesta de 10 mandamientos donde aparezcan 10 conductas dañinas propias del acoso escol
Svetlanka [38]

Answer:

No hablo español

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
14. Which of the following allows a president to alter the meaning of a bill while sigms
svlad2 [7]

14. D

15. A

16. B

dab (ya yeet)

Have a great day!

4 0
3 years ago
In the case of Fletcher v. Peck the Supreme Court:
astra-53 [7]

Answer:

d. upheld the sanctity of contracts.

Explanation:

The case was caused by the fraudulent nature of the Yazoo land sale in Georgia. In 1795, lawyers in Georgia agreed to sell the Yazoo land to about four companies. John Peck was among those who acquired a part of the Yazoo lands. On reselling the land to Robert Fletcher some years later, it was discovered that the Yazoo Land Act had been repealed because the lawyers involved were bribed. Fletcher thus argued in court that because the original Act had been repealed, John Peck had no right to sell the land.

When the case was brought to the United States Supreme court, the judges unanimously upheld the sanctity of contracts stating that the contract was binding despite the fraudulent activities of the lawyers involved. Therefore, the Georgian state did not have the powers to invalidate a contract  that had legal backing.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • 4.) Becky Smith signed a note in the amount of $200,000 in favor of Country Home Loans, Inc., to obtain a loan to buy a house in
    10·1 answer
  • For impeachment proceedings to begin, a president has to be accused of​
    6·1 answer
  • Any driver under 21 years of age who is stopped by a police officer
    11·2 answers
  • Why do you think people shoplift? Why do so many teens shoplift? List three reasons.
    6·2 answers
  • Select the statement that indicates retaliatory proctectionism
    15·1 answer
  • Early American private banks were allowed to print paper money called bank
    13·2 answers
  • State law of gravitational force
    6·1 answer
  • If you are deaf and communicate with sign language: Question 5 options: You may bring an interpreter with you to the Knowledge a
    12·1 answer
  • ¿
    12·2 answers
  • I need help asap plz
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!