Answer:
it should call back the bonds as it will save $8.25
Explanation:
Bond Price can be calculated using PV function. After 3 years,
N = 2, PMT = 5% x 1000 = 50, FV = 1000, I/Y = 2%
=> Compute PV = $1,058.25
Without the call option, the bond would be worth $1,058.25. But the firm can buy those bonds at $1,050.
Hence, it should call back the bonds as it will save $8.25
Answer and Explanation:
The computation of the service level and the corresponding optimal stocking level is shown below:
Given that
Selling price = SP = $4.50
Cost price = CP = $3.00
So,
Salvage value = V = $1.50
Average daily demand (d) = 35 quarts
The standard deviation of daily demand = 4 quarts
based on the above information
Overage cost = (Co) is
= CP - V
= $3.00 - $1.50
= $1.50
Now
Underage cost= (Cu)
= SP - CP
= $4.50 - $3.00
= $1.50
So,
Service level is
= Cu ÷ (Co + Cu)
= 1.50 ÷ (1.50 + 1.50)
= 1.50 ÷ 3.00
= 0.50
= 50%
Now
At 50 % service level, the value of Z is 0
So,
Optimal stocking level is
= d + Z × standard deviation
= 35 + (0 × 4)
= 35 + 0
= 35 quarts
That it increases the money supply and the inflation is higher. More money can be loaned out by the bank.
if 1500+0.75y+500+g =(g)+(0.75y)+(1500+500) the simplified answer would be
=g+0.75y+2000
Bistro's first banner was a form of a unilateral contract. This means that the banner was a legally enforceable promise between two parties where one party will perform the requirement and the other (Bistro) would pay.
For the given situation, Daisy substantially performed the required task and therefore, Bistro is not allowed to revoke the offer.
Based on the above, the statement that <span>best describes Daisy's and Bistro's rights in this situation is:
</span><span>Bistro cannot revoke the offer because Daisy has substantially performed the requested action.</span>
