1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Anna11 [10]
3 years ago
15

Briefly explain ONE common trait in the policies of two of these European nations toward Native Americans:

History
1 answer:
Black_prince [1.1K]3 years ago
7 0
Spanish and English had a negative view toward the Indians. While the French saw them as potential economic and military allies.
You might be interested in
5. What four areas were<br> tenant-in-chief in charge of?
leva [86]

Answer: THE WERE A FEW DIFFERENT TASKS THEY DID...

Explanation:

Tenants-in-chief had a financial role to support the king, by giving the monarch a share of the money raised on their land. Tenants-in-chief had a role supporting knights, by providing weapons and horses for military service. The tenants-in-chief were originally responsible for providing knights and soldiers for the king's feudal army. They were in charge of holding land for the king, directly from the king. They were appointed by the king, to upkeep the land designated to them, and send the King, and share of the benifits.

7 0
3 years ago
Cuál piensan que es el sentido para que los pueblos originarios
Taya2010 [7]

Answer:

por que recuerdan a esos tiempos en los que no habían tantos avances como ahora

Explanation: esa es mi opinión

8 0
3 years ago
LOTS OF POINTS! IMPORTANT!
cluponka [151]
The 4 bottom ones are all true. Radical Republicans took control of Congress and managed Reconstruction until its end in 1877.
6 0
3 years ago
China reached its greatest height during the ______.
kotegsom [21]
China wall greatest height
7 0
3 years ago
Should a defendant have the right to appeal his district court decision in an appeals court.
jekas [21]

Answer:

Explanation:Although some cases are decided based on written briefs alone, many cases are selected for an "oral argument" before the court. Oral argument in the court of appeals is a structured discussion between the appellate lawyers and the panel of judges focusing on the legal principles in dispute. Each side is given a short time — usually about 15 minutes — to present arguments to the court.

A litigant who loses in a federal court of appeals, or in the highest court of a state, may file a petition for a "writ of certiorari," which is a document asking the Supreme Court to review the case. The Supreme Court, however, does not have to grant review. The Court typically will agree to hear a case only when it involves an unusually important legal principle, or when two or more federal appellate courts have interpreted a law differently. There are also a small number of special circumstances in which the Supreme Court is required by law to hear an appeal.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did many delegates from northern states view slavery? O A. They wanted to expand slavery into other states. O B. They wanted
    15·2 answers
  • What multiplication expression represents 7+7+7+7?
    12·2 answers
  • This explorer was looking for a way to go west from Europe to find Asia. He instead discovered a famous river and explored the a
    10·1 answer
  • What caused the conflict in the Persian and Greek minor?
    10·1 answer
  • What were the issues that were causing our new country to fall apart?
    12·1 answer
  • Which statement is true?
    8·2 answers
  • Why do citizens have to register to vote
    13·2 answers
  • 21. How did the Dust Bowl impact population demographics in the United States?
    6·1 answer
  • How are the product food items sold or distribute in a convenient way​
    10·2 answers
  • Question 10 (4 points)
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!