Mahala is standing and fishing on a dock that is 2 1/4 feet above the surface of the water in the pond. Her baited hook is 1.5 f
eet below the surface of the water. The surface of the water is represented by the rational number 0. Use the number line to graph the distance the dock, point D, is above the water and the hook, point H, is below the water. Make sure you label each point appropriately.
1 answer:
Answer:
The graph is shown below.
Step-by-step explanation:
Take the distance above surface of water as positive and negative for below the surface.
Given:
Distance of dock from the surface of water,
Distance of hook from the surface of water,
The surface of water is the reference point and hence it has a value of 0.
Now, on a number line, the values to the left of 0 mark is negative and values to the right are positive.
Therefore, H will lie on the left of 0 mark and D will lie on the right as shown below.
You might be interested in
Let's carry this math sentence over to its natural, "shapey" element. We're going to look at each term not as an ordinary number, but as <em>the area of some shape</em>.
x² (read as "x <em>squared"</em>) can be seen as the area of a square with side lengths of x. 2x can similarly be seen as the area of a <em>rectangle </em>with a length of x and a width of 2. (Picture 1)
What's our question actually asking, though? Something about <em>perfect squares</em>. More specifically, we're looking for something to add on that'll <em>make this thing a perfect square</em>. We're trying to find a missing piece we can slot in to make a square, in other words. Problem is, our shapes don't look much like a square if we put them together right now. We need to do a little cutting and gluing first.
First, we're gonna cut the 2x rectangle lengthwise, getting two rectangles with an area of x, a length of 1, and a width of x. Next, we're going to attach them to the x² square, creating this shape that looks, strangely, like a square with a little bit missing from it (picture 2). What we're trying to do is <em>complete this square, </em>to find the area of that little missing chunk.
As it turns out, we have all the information we need for this. Notice that, using the lengths of the x rectangles, we can find that the square's dimensions are 1 x 1, which means that its area is 1 x 1 = 1.
If we tack this new area on to our original expression, we've "completed the square!" We now have a perfect square with side lengths of (x + 1) and an area of (x + 1)² (picture 3).
So, our final expression is x² + 2x + 1, and the missing constant - the area of the "missing square" we had to find to complete our larger one - is 1.
